In the early days of authoritarian rule, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) seized a substantial amount of real estate in Taiwan. As this portion of the party's stolen assets is difficult to conceal, the public believes that the KMT's holdings largely consist of real estate.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has specified the location of KMT properties to force the party to return these assets. Since KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
However, focusing on the KMT's real estate is a trap for the uninitiated. KMT statistics reveal that real estate only accounts for one-tenth of the party's total assets, and this is now disappearing rapidly.
To clarify the extent of the assets that the KMT has stolen from the Taiwanese people, we have to look at total party revenues and expenditures.
First, membership fees: This type of revenue cannot even cover the cost of stationery and propaganda materials, not to mention adding to the party's assets.
Second, donations: In the past, donating to the KMT was the standard method for gaining special economic privileges or offsetting overdue taxes. Donations were therefore just another way for party members to dip their hands into the national treasury.
Third, there are enterprises and properties that were owned by the Japanese government during the colonial period.
Fourth, there are party-run companies that were granted monopolies by the KMT government and enjoyed monopoly profits, just as if the party had set up a series of "government monopoly bureaus."
Fifth, special privileges meant that party-run enterprises undertook government construction and service contracts, thus generating huge profits.
Sixth, party-run enterprises also took commissions by brokering public procurement projects, increasing government procurement costs and minimizing profit on government sales.
Finally, the government earmarked budget items to subsidize KMT-run enterprises or institutions.
Breaking down the KMT's revenue base reveals that all of the party's assets belong to the Taiwanese people.
It is even easier to calculate the party's expenditures. Party expenditures over the past 50-odd years have averaged between NT$7 billion (US$210 million) and NT$8 billion each year. That is, over the past five decades, the KMT has spent a total of NT$400 billion to NT$500 billion. And this does not even include campaign expenditures.
In other words, if the KMT ever possessed any so-called "legitimate" assets, they would have all been spent by now.
The KMT now claims that it has only NT$20 billion worth of assets left. The truth of the matter, however, is that regardless of how much those party assets are worth, they are all stolen assets and should be immediately returned to the people. No matter how the KMT tries to launder its money or defends itself, this is an undeniable fact that no sophistry in the world can conceal.
Most of the KMT's assets originate with profits and interest gains made from the "reinvestment" of loot taken during the Martial Law era. The mere existence of the party's assets is in fact a substantial extension of the Martial Law period.
It is also the biggest impediment to Taiwan's democratization, and the core of the issue of historical justice. Once this issue is solved, there is hope for Taiwan's political and economic situation. It could even be said that the legacy of the DPP's eight years in power will stand and fall with the ability to resolve this issue.
Lin Chia is an independent economics commentator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS