In the early days of authoritarian rule, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) seized a substantial amount of real estate in Taiwan. As this portion of the party's stolen assets is difficult to conceal, the public believes that the KMT's holdings largely consist of real estate.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has specified the location of KMT properties to force the party to return these assets. Since KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
However, focusing on the KMT's real estate is a trap for the uninitiated. KMT statistics reveal that real estate only accounts for one-tenth of the party's total assets, and this is now disappearing rapidly.
To clarify the extent of the assets that the KMT has stolen from the Taiwanese people, we have to look at total party revenues and expenditures.
First, membership fees: This type of revenue cannot even cover the cost of stationery and propaganda materials, not to mention adding to the party's assets.
Second, donations: In the past, donating to the KMT was the standard method for gaining special economic privileges or offsetting overdue taxes. Donations were therefore just another way for party members to dip their hands into the national treasury.
Third, there are enterprises and properties that were owned by the Japanese government during the colonial period.
Fourth, there are party-run companies that were granted monopolies by the KMT government and enjoyed monopoly profits, just as if the party had set up a series of "government monopoly bureaus."
Fifth, special privileges meant that party-run enterprises undertook government construction and service contracts, thus generating huge profits.
Sixth, party-run enterprises also took commissions by brokering public procurement projects, increasing government procurement costs and minimizing profit on government sales.
Finally, the government earmarked budget items to subsidize KMT-run enterprises or institutions.
Breaking down the KMT's revenue base reveals that all of the party's assets belong to the Taiwanese people.
It is even easier to calculate the party's expenditures. Party expenditures over the past 50-odd years have averaged between NT$7 billion (US$210 million) and NT$8 billion each year. That is, over the past five decades, the KMT has spent a total of NT$400 billion to NT$500 billion. And this does not even include campaign expenditures.
In other words, if the KMT ever possessed any so-called "legitimate" assets, they would have all been spent by now.
The KMT now claims that it has only NT$20 billion worth of assets left. The truth of the matter, however, is that regardless of how much those party assets are worth, they are all stolen assets and should be immediately returned to the people. No matter how the KMT tries to launder its money or defends itself, this is an undeniable fact that no sophistry in the world can conceal.
Most of the KMT's assets originate with profits and interest gains made from the "reinvestment" of loot taken during the Martial Law era. The mere existence of the party's assets is in fact a substantial extension of the Martial Law period.
It is also the biggest impediment to Taiwan's democratization, and the core of the issue of historical justice. Once this issue is solved, there is hope for Taiwan's political and economic situation. It could even be said that the legacy of the DPP's eight years in power will stand and fall with the ability to resolve this issue.
Lin Chia is an independent economics commentator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS