On Oct. 9, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to economist Muhammad Yunus of Bangladesh and the Grameen Bank that he founded. Yunus and the bank were recognized for finding a way to help the poor negatively affected by globalization and capitalism. When contrasted with the current climate of fear following North Korea's nuclear test, Yunus' method of promoting peace by tackling poverty becomes an even more meaningful example of positive peace.
We live in a time in which the technology humans have developed has been used to produce unimaginably awful weapons, and in which we are constantly threatened by mass destruction. Not only has violence released the damaging power of war itself and disrupted international order, but it also threatens the very conditions for human existence.
However, we should not seek to promote peace by using violence to deal with violence. Nor should we limit ourselves to relying on diplomacy or deterrence to protect national security.
The key lies in discovering how to advance all of humanity and use "the science of survival" to confront all forms of violence.
"Passive peace" only seeks to achieve the elimination of direct violence and prevent war. The goal of "active peace" goes beyond this by attempting to eliminate the social factors threatening human survival. These include poverty and economic inequality, because weapons are not the only thing that can kill. Violence and poverty are both conditions that can suppress social and economic development, so promoting human rights and economic development can also be tools for creating peace.
However, rapid economic growth does not necessarily improve people's lives. In fact, according to the logic of capitalism, it may cause some people to fall into abject poverty. It can obstruct peace by creating class polarization and a widening gap between rich and poor countries.
Many development plans and international relief efforts are implemented in the name of eliminating poverty, but are actually excuses to promote investment and improve the lives of the rich. These plans may dam rivers and create electricity, build airplanes and trains to take people where they want to go and open up mines for excavation, but there are still many people who are left in dire need.
The natural environment that many people rely on for their livelihood is often destroyed in the name of "development," plunging people who were once able to get by into poverty. For those poor who are truly in need of help, development doesn't create a more equal world, just more severe discrimination and displacement.
The purpose of Yunus' bank is to help the poor by providing them with micro-loans -- small non-profit loans to individual entrepreneurs. It also unites the strengths of the underprivileged to promote common welfare by offering collective financial help.
More importantly, it seeks to establish an economic system that is based at the local level and which gives people diversity and autonomy. It is an idea that relies on all people using their hands and heads and making decisions about how to improve their lives instead of relying on policies dictated on high by bureaucrats.
The example of Grameen Bank shows that poor countries trying to develop don't need to search abroad for a model to emulate. Instead, the form of development can come from the grassroots levels of local society. Changes have to take root at the local level to establish independent and sustainable development, eliminate the social factors threatening human existence and thus improve society as a whole. This is the essence of active peace.
Pan Mei-lin is an assistant professor at the National Chiao Tung University's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Translated by Marc Langer
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS