When world-renowned physicist Yang Chen-ning (
Yang is a Nobel laureate in physics. Although there was not an age limit for retirement in the US, and he was healthy both physically and mentally, he still decided to retire and devote himself to working for Beijing's Tsinghua University.
Unlike many retirees who are at a loss after retirement, he did not feel sad. He even married a 28-year-old woman in 2004. Today, at 84, he always puts on a happy smile and lives a wonderful life, while the students at Tsinghua have the chance to learn from this true master.
Why should people retire when they reach a certain age? What is the best time for retirement? Such questions deserve to be considered.
I believe that the retirement system was produced to regulate public servants. But the private sector has also gradually adopted the system. Generally, public posts are relatively stable. Unless a public servant commits a crime, he can hardly be dismissed even if he is incompetent. Therefore, the system is the best way for him to leave gracefully when he reaches a certain age. Unfortunately, this also forces other capable employees to leave their posts, while the country suffers from loss of productivity.
In ancient times, its was difficult for people to make a living. They had to work hard every day and retirement was not an option. Even if they had children and grandchildren, they had to support a big family.
Fifty or 60 years ago, civil servants in Taiwan generally retired in their 50s, but the average lifespan for men was less than 50 years at the time. Even if they did not retire, they were more than likely to fall victim to old age and disease.
Today, the average retirement age is about 65. But the average life expectancy of men is exceeds 75, and that of women is more than 80, so retirement generally precedes death by more than 10 years.
Some military officials, civil servants, and teachers choose to retire early, because they are eligible for "full retirement pensions" once they reach 50. Afterward, they just idle away their time at home and live a boring life. Perhaps they go on a package tour once a year. Such a life is really meaningless.
As they enjoy the pensions for 20 or 30 years, they also consume precious national resources, becoming a heavy burden for all. Thus, the early retirement system is bad for both individuals and the country.
The aging population is a serious problem for this country. We all worry that if the number of young people is low in the future, there will be insufficient manpower to take care of our senior citizens. Several ideas about how the government should take care of our seniors were discussed at the recent Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development.
But nobody talked about the huge budget for pensions as the working population and taxes decrease, or the improvement of the retirement system. It makes me feel that the government has failed to "suit the remedy to the illness," as the old Chinese saying goes.
Seniors are not necessarily weak or slow. Some are as energetic and swift as young people;they can take care of themselves and others. As we encourage the weak and the challenged to work, we have deprived such healthy citizens of their right to work. This does not tally with social justice. Not to mention that it is a pity for us to abandon productive talent that would still serve our society.
The US abolished the so-called retirement age long ago. Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and some other countries have followed suit. All these countries are strongly against racial, religious, gender, age or any other kind of discrimination. However, due to their historical traditions, most countries in the world only dare to loosen their mandatory retirement rules gradually.
With the world's second-lowest birth rate, and the rapidly aging population, perhaps Taiwan should consider similar methods. Concern about the falling birth rate should be coupled with worry over funding an expensive pension system.
Perhaps a graduated pension system should be devised, so that elderly workers can adjust their workload and the nature of their work depending on their seniority, performance, health and plans. By doing this, it may be easier for those who are about to retire to adjust to the change.
More importantly, such a policy would combat age discrimination, and base society on a just and economically sustainable foundation of "able-bodied people all contributing, so that the weak can all be looked after."
Tsong Tien-tzou is a research fellow in the Institute of Physics at the Academia Sinica.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS