The decision by the Council of Grand Justices ruling the National Communications Commission (NCC) unconstitutional has sparked another spat between the government and opposition.
Despite announcing that Article 4 of the Organic Law of the NCC (
Politics prevailed from the founding of the NCC. Even after the council ruled the NCC unconstitutional, political calculation still dominates the thinking of commission members. Their refusal to step down will sabotage the organization's credibility and independence. and will turn the NCC into another battlefield for rival political camps.
The council's ruling has both constitutional and political implications. According to Article 4 of the Organic Law of the NCC, political parties will "recommend" 15 nominees out of the 18 on the commission. These 15 had to be apportioned based on the proportion of the parties' legislative seats, meaning the major party in the legislature would have most seats on the commission. The premier selected the final three nominees. All 18 nominees were required to gain the approval of a nomination committee.
Article 16 regulated that any punishment meted out to media organizations prior to the commission's establishment could be reconsidered upon appeal. Constitutionally speaking, the legal basis of the NCC interfered with the Cabinet's exercise of power. Grand justices believed that Article 4 infringed the Cabinet's authority as the nation's top administrative government office, which is protected by the Constitution. Since the Constitution vests the power to appoint government officials in the hands of the executive branch, the composition of the NCC based largely on partisan interests, violated the principle of political independence of such a media watchdog mechanism.
The fact that pan-blues have taken advantage of their majority in the legislature and its review authority to approve their favorite candidates has run against the premier's constitutional powers.
As with so many laws passed by the pan-blue controlled legislature in recent years, the NCC's organic law is tailored to suit the interests of the pan-blue parties and to enlarge the legislature's powers. Such partisan-driven political maneuvering is not only detrimental to democratic evolution but also to press freedom.
The nation's rapid democratic change since 2000 has not necessarily brought about healthy political development or a fair, yet competitive media culture. Instead, what we have witnessed is a lack of professionalism and overemphasis on trivial stories from our media. In most cases it has become a tool for politicians.
Opinion polls increasingly show that people have become suspicious of the media and increasingly adept at spotting its attempts at manipulation. People now see the media as a kind of special-interest group, no more objective or independent than any other group in its views.
To untie the political knots of the pan-green/pan-blue struggle, any attempt to forge an independent media watchdog organization must exclude political influence.
To play a constructive role as the "fourth branch of the government," we need a non-partisan, truly independent NCC. There should be no political interference in the nomination and review procedure of selecting its members. Only through institutionalization of the NCC and exclusion of political influence can we enjoy a free and healthy media.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented