The decision by the Council of Grand Justices ruling the National Communications Commission (NCC) unconstitutional has sparked another spat between the government and opposition.
Despite announcing that Article 4 of the Organic Law of the NCC (
Politics prevailed from the founding of the NCC. Even after the council ruled the NCC unconstitutional, political calculation still dominates the thinking of commission members. Their refusal to step down will sabotage the organization's credibility and independence. and will turn the NCC into another battlefield for rival political camps.
The council's ruling has both constitutional and political implications. According to Article 4 of the Organic Law of the NCC, political parties will "recommend" 15 nominees out of the 18 on the commission. These 15 had to be apportioned based on the proportion of the parties' legislative seats, meaning the major party in the legislature would have most seats on the commission. The premier selected the final three nominees. All 18 nominees were required to gain the approval of a nomination committee.
Article 16 regulated that any punishment meted out to media organizations prior to the commission's establishment could be reconsidered upon appeal. Constitutionally speaking, the legal basis of the NCC interfered with the Cabinet's exercise of power. Grand justices believed that Article 4 infringed the Cabinet's authority as the nation's top administrative government office, which is protected by the Constitution. Since the Constitution vests the power to appoint government officials in the hands of the executive branch, the composition of the NCC based largely on partisan interests, violated the principle of political independence of such a media watchdog mechanism.
The fact that pan-blues have taken advantage of their majority in the legislature and its review authority to approve their favorite candidates has run against the premier's constitutional powers.
As with so many laws passed by the pan-blue controlled legislature in recent years, the NCC's organic law is tailored to suit the interests of the pan-blue parties and to enlarge the legislature's powers. Such partisan-driven political maneuvering is not only detrimental to democratic evolution but also to press freedom.
The nation's rapid democratic change since 2000 has not necessarily brought about healthy political development or a fair, yet competitive media culture. Instead, what we have witnessed is a lack of professionalism and overemphasis on trivial stories from our media. In most cases it has become a tool for politicians.
Opinion polls increasingly show that people have become suspicious of the media and increasingly adept at spotting its attempts at manipulation. People now see the media as a kind of special-interest group, no more objective or independent than any other group in its views.
To untie the political knots of the pan-green/pan-blue struggle, any attempt to forge an independent media watchdog organization must exclude political influence.
To play a constructive role as the "fourth branch of the government," we need a non-partisan, truly independent NCC. There should be no political interference in the nomination and review procedure of selecting its members. Only through institutionalization of the NCC and exclusion of political influence can we enjoy a free and healthy media.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more