The year-end mayoral elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung offer an opportunity to push new urban development strategies, lifestyle choices, consider urban problems and create a vision for the future. However, the debate over which candidate is more honest and whether a particular political heavyweight is willing to throw his hat in the ring has drowned out the debate on urban development in these two cities.
Between March and April of each year, the US firm Mercer Human Resource Consulting surveys more than two hundred cities worldwide and ranks them according to quality-of-living (QOL). The survey provides a detailed analysis of the inhabitable level of each major city and is a major resource for business people traveling between major cities in a globalized world.
Top scoring cities on the QOL index have established themselves as destinations capable of attracting greater trade and investment. Lower-ranking cities on the QOL index are considered relatively backwards and lack competitiveness in the world economy.
The only two cities in Taiwan that make this year's list are Taipei in 81st place and Kaohsiung in 101st. It is surprising that none of the mayoral hopefuls for either Taipei or Kaohsiung have aired their view on the positions of the two cities in this survey. In view of this, how should we look at the rankings?
Mercer's QOL study is based on detailed evaluation of several factors; including political, social and economic environment, medical and health services, schools and education, public administration and transport, recreation, consumer goods, housing and the natural environment. In most of the categories, Taipei City scored above average. But in terms of traffic congestion, Taipei fared pretty much the same as it did last year, getting a relatively low score.
Taipei's score was also relatively low with regard to drinking water, air pollution, leisure activities, climate and natural disasters, which is why it is ranked 81 on the list. Kaohsiung's score in every category was slightly lower than Taipei's, placing the port city in 101st position. In Asia, Singapore has overtaken Tokyo, Japan's highest scoring city, as the top Asian city, moving into 34th position. In Japan, Tokyo and Osaka are ranked 35th and 51st, respectively. Hong Kong ranked 68th and Seoul 89th.
This year's survey also places Shanghai and Beijing 103rd and 122nd position, respectively. Looking at the 2002 survey, it is easy to see that both Beijing and Shanghai are catching up with other cities around the world, for Shanghai and Beijing were placed 134th and 139th in 2002. However, both Taipei and Kaohsiung have hovered around the position over the past few years. Although their scores have been consistent, they have yet to progress as Beijing or Shanghai has. Shanghai is narrowing the gap between itself and Kaohsiung, and there is now just 2 points between them.
There are a variety of similar international assessments of cities, and the Mercer survey is just one of the more representative of these surveys. In the wake of the Kyoto Protocol, greenhouse gas emissions per capita is another important yardstick for a fundamental evaluation of a city. Kaohsiung's gas emissions per capita have reached 34.6 tonnes, three times higher than most major cities in the world, bucking the trend toward lower carbon emissions.
In times of election, politicians become reluctant to talk about issues that may affect urban progress. Only by tearing down our own restrictions and looking at the mayoral elections from a global perspective can we truly begin to solve these issues.
Liou Ming-lone is the chairman of the Environmental Quality Protection Foundation.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining