Meet little Lawrence. He's cute, he's clever, he's cherished ... and for every week of his little life, he's costing his parents another US$1,110.
There's nothing unusual about two-year-old Lawrence. He's just like thousands of other middle-class babies born in Hong Kong. The only difference is that, shortly before he was born, his parents sat down and worked out precisely how much he would cost them.
What they discovered goes a long way to explaining why the city has the lowest birth rate in the developed world. By the time Lawrence is 26, parents Janice and Louis expect to be US$1.5 million worse off than if they had never had him.
His kindergarten fees alone will set Janice and Louis back US$32,500, primary and secondary schooling US$232,200 and going to an overseas university and graduate school another US$413,000.
Then there are Lawrence's living costs -- US$122,500 for food, US$241,500 on clothes, US$56,500 on transport, US$93,000 on pocket money, US$22,700 on spectacles and eyecare, US$13,000 on visits to the dentist and US$107,000 on language and music lessons.
Janice, 38, managing director of an advertising agency, admits that if she and her financier husband had done their sums earlier, they may have thought twice about starting a family.
"It was a big dose of reality," she admitted.
"Our reaction was, `We shouldn't have worked that out,' because now we have got a lot of thinking to do about whether we [should] have a second. Cost is a key factor and it has a big influence on the number of children people have in Hong Kong these days. Our parents' generation didn't even think about it. They just went out and had babies and got on with life," she said.
In today's Hong Kong, however, babies have become a luxury of choice and an indulgence that fewer and fewer young couples in the wealthy city of 6.8 million are opting to spend their hard-earned salaries upon.
In an increasingly competitive society, the cost of rearing a child to have the best possible chance of success is higher than ever. As a result, most couples now choose to remain childless or to stop at one child, and Hong Kong's birthrate has fallen from nearly three children per woman in 1980 to 0.9 last year.
It is a dilemma which has left Hong Kong facing a population crisis, with the number of elderly people aged over 64 expected to triple proportionately and account for nearly half the population by 2033.
There are cheaper choices, of course -- state schools, economies on clothes and less out-of-school activities. Louis and Janice looked into the potential savings and concluded that the most economical child-rearing in Hong Kong would leave them with a large bill of US$335,000 over 26 years.
Susan Lo, senior doctor with the Hong Kong Family Planning Association and mother of an eight-year-old daughter, said there had been a fundamental generational shift in family thinking.
"In the old days, people like my parents would think, `I will have children to safeguard my retirement. They will support me financially and psychologically and care for me in my old age,'" Lo said.
"If you ask the younger generation today, they will tell you it is nonsense to think of supporting your parents. They believe everybody should be responsible for their own lives," she said.
Lo conducted studies on Hong Kong couples considering having children and couples who have had one or two children and found that financial concerns were high on the anxiety list for both groups.
The most dramatic aspect of Hong Kong's falling birth rate is its sheer scale. No country in the world has seen such a steep decline over the past two decades, according to the think tank Civic Exchange.
While countries like the UK and Germany fret over what to do about their birth rates of 1.6 and 1.3 children per woman respectively, Hong Kong's fell to 0.8 percent in 2004 and rebounded to 0.9 last year.
Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) last year urged couples to have three children each. The government is meanwhile working on its first official population policy, which is expected to include incentives such as tax relief for bigger families.
A key factor driving birth rates down, Lo said, is the length of time children remain dependent on their parents.
"In the old days, when a child was 15 or 16, they could go out to work. Today, if my daughter is independent after getting her bachelor's degree, I would be very happy. People can expect to support their children up to when they finish their degrees when they are already in their 20s," she said.
Finances aside, Lo believes that Hong Kong's main problem is that in the maelstrom of modern urban living, people may have lost sight of what is important in life.
"In Hong Kong we seem to have gone to the extreme without looking back at the value of families," she said "We neglected to look at the reasons why a family is important -- bonding, cohesion, taking care of family members."
There may be a turn in the tide, however, Lo said.
"When SARS hit Hong Kong in 2003, people came to realize that spending time with the family is actually very pleasurable. Now that the economy is improving, there are signs too that attitudes may be changing," she said.
"A lot of people seem to be getting pregnant this year. I have had three friends who have had babies this month alone. People seem to be revaluating families again and starting to think more about family relationships rather than just `money, money, money,'" Lo said.
Surprisingly, despite realizing the financial impact baby Lawrence has had on their lives, Janice and Louis have decided they want a second child.
"We live in a competitive world and a sometimes very brutal world," Janice said. "When things happen, we only have our family to fall back on, and I want to give our son a family foundation. Having a brother or sister is something that has more value than money."
Lo, on the other hand, said: "I won't be having any more children. The main reason is because my daughter says she doesn't want siblings. I have been asking her since she was three-years-old and her reply has been `Definitely not.' I feel it is something I should honor if she still feels she is content to be an only child. She is happy because she has all the goodies, she has her own room -- and she has her parents to play with."
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS