Meet little Lawrence. He's cute, he's clever, he's cherished ... and for every week of his little life, he's costing his parents another US$1,110.
There's nothing unusual about two-year-old Lawrence. He's just like thousands of other middle-class babies born in Hong Kong. The only difference is that, shortly before he was born, his parents sat down and worked out precisely how much he would cost them.
What they discovered goes a long way to explaining why the city has the lowest birth rate in the developed world. By the time Lawrence is 26, parents Janice and Louis expect to be US$1.5 million worse off than if they had never had him.
His kindergarten fees alone will set Janice and Louis back US$32,500, primary and secondary schooling US$232,200 and going to an overseas university and graduate school another US$413,000.
Then there are Lawrence's living costs -- US$122,500 for food, US$241,500 on clothes, US$56,500 on transport, US$93,000 on pocket money, US$22,700 on spectacles and eyecare, US$13,000 on visits to the dentist and US$107,000 on language and music lessons.
Janice, 38, managing director of an advertising agency, admits that if she and her financier husband had done their sums earlier, they may have thought twice about starting a family.
"It was a big dose of reality," she admitted.
"Our reaction was, `We shouldn't have worked that out,' because now we have got a lot of thinking to do about whether we [should] have a second. Cost is a key factor and it has a big influence on the number of children people have in Hong Kong these days. Our parents' generation didn't even think about it. They just went out and had babies and got on with life," she said.
In today's Hong Kong, however, babies have become a luxury of choice and an indulgence that fewer and fewer young couples in the wealthy city of 6.8 million are opting to spend their hard-earned salaries upon.
In an increasingly competitive society, the cost of rearing a child to have the best possible chance of success is higher than ever. As a result, most couples now choose to remain childless or to stop at one child, and Hong Kong's birthrate has fallen from nearly three children per woman in 1980 to 0.9 last year.
It is a dilemma which has left Hong Kong facing a population crisis, with the number of elderly people aged over 64 expected to triple proportionately and account for nearly half the population by 2033.
There are cheaper choices, of course -- state schools, economies on clothes and less out-of-school activities. Louis and Janice looked into the potential savings and concluded that the most economical child-rearing in Hong Kong would leave them with a large bill of US$335,000 over 26 years.
Susan Lo, senior doctor with the Hong Kong Family Planning Association and mother of an eight-year-old daughter, said there had been a fundamental generational shift in family thinking.
"In the old days, people like my parents would think, `I will have children to safeguard my retirement. They will support me financially and psychologically and care for me in my old age,'" Lo said.
"If you ask the younger generation today, they will tell you it is nonsense to think of supporting your parents. They believe everybody should be responsible for their own lives," she said.
Lo conducted studies on Hong Kong couples considering having children and couples who have had one or two children and found that financial concerns were high on the anxiety list for both groups.
The most dramatic aspect of Hong Kong's falling birth rate is its sheer scale. No country in the world has seen such a steep decline over the past two decades, according to the think tank Civic Exchange.
While countries like the UK and Germany fret over what to do about their birth rates of 1.6 and 1.3 children per woman respectively, Hong Kong's fell to 0.8 percent in 2004 and rebounded to 0.9 last year.
Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) last year urged couples to have three children each. The government is meanwhile working on its first official population policy, which is expected to include incentives such as tax relief for bigger families.
A key factor driving birth rates down, Lo said, is the length of time children remain dependent on their parents.
"In the old days, when a child was 15 or 16, they could go out to work. Today, if my daughter is independent after getting her bachelor's degree, I would be very happy. People can expect to support their children up to when they finish their degrees when they are already in their 20s," she said.
Finances aside, Lo believes that Hong Kong's main problem is that in the maelstrom of modern urban living, people may have lost sight of what is important in life.
"In Hong Kong we seem to have gone to the extreme without looking back at the value of families," she said "We neglected to look at the reasons why a family is important -- bonding, cohesion, taking care of family members."
There may be a turn in the tide, however, Lo said.
"When SARS hit Hong Kong in 2003, people came to realize that spending time with the family is actually very pleasurable. Now that the economy is improving, there are signs too that attitudes may be changing," she said.
"A lot of people seem to be getting pregnant this year. I have had three friends who have had babies this month alone. People seem to be revaluating families again and starting to think more about family relationships rather than just `money, money, money,'" Lo said.
Surprisingly, despite realizing the financial impact baby Lawrence has had on their lives, Janice and Louis have decided they want a second child.
"We live in a competitive world and a sometimes very brutal world," Janice said. "When things happen, we only have our family to fall back on, and I want to give our son a family foundation. Having a brother or sister is something that has more value than money."
Lo, on the other hand, said: "I won't be having any more children. The main reason is because my daughter says she doesn't want siblings. I have been asking her since she was three-years-old and her reply has been `Definitely not.' I feel it is something I should honor if she still feels she is content to be an only child. She is happy because she has all the goodies, she has her own room -- and she has her parents to play with."
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS