The controversy over President Chen Shui-bian's (
Chen's staff argued that the transit proposal suggested by the administration of US President George W. Bush was unacceptable because it failed to treat the democratically elected president of Taiwan with respect, and the delegation therefore preferred to search for an alternative arrangement.
The government, however, should refrain from engaging in political rhetoric with the US and should use diplomacy to straighten things out.
The statement released by Chen's staff that "Taiwan would become the son of the United States if we accepted the transit arrangement" was inappropriate and will not help in mending fences.
The timing and context of Chen's transit has become a litmus test of US-Taiwan relations, given that Chinese President Hu Jintao (
According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the White House insisted on its original proposal, which restricted Chen's transit to outside the mainland US. The government considered this to be unfriendly and even humiliating. As such, the foreign ministry needed a contingency plan for Chen's transit stop. But both sides failed to minimize the impact of the issues that have politicized US-Taiwan relations.
Earlier this year, Chen's move to mothball the National Unification Council (NUC) and its guidelines angered Washington, because Taipei landed it with another "surprise."
Some predicted that the Bush administration might use the Chinese leader's visit to punish Chen. Taipei should recognize that Bush did not condemn the NUC decision during his meeting with Hu.
Relations between Taipei and Washington have gone through ups and downs recently, and there is room for better communication and understanding. Even Chen, when he met with the new director of the American Institute in Taiwan, Steven Young, emphasized several times that there would be no more "surprises."
Another concern of Washington's decision-makers is that as an open, transparent democracy, the US expects more from Taiwan. Washington supports Chen's administration because he is a democratically elected leader. But Beijing profoundly distrusts Chen.
While it is essential for leaders in Taipei and Washington to improve communication and mutual trust, and avoid adding unpredictability to the relationship, it is also important for Taiwan to earn more respect and fair treatment from the US, regardless of China's influence. Nevertheless, the effort on Taiwan's side has not been good enough.
The Bush administration also must avoid incorporating a double standard in its treatment of Taiwan in the course of engaging with Beijing. Bush should contemplate the degree to which his administration can keep a balance between safeguarding US interests and those of a democratic Taiwan, while at the same time engaging China and trying to mold it into a responsible stakeholder.
Looking ahead, Taipei should communicate more with Washington, while Washington should encourage Taiwan's efforts to establish good governance and political institutionalization.
Liu kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS