On April 20, Minister of Agriculture Su Jia-chyuan (
In Japan, the primary output value of every single hectare of paddy field is estimated to be some NT$360,000. But these paddy fields also hold water reserves rich in nutrients, store rainwater and flood waters, and provide a natural habitat for wild animals. They can also absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and can be used for recreational and educational purposes. The value of all these things added together is what we have come to term "green GDP."
So, how much is this worth? According to estimates by Japanese academics, the figure is approximately NT$800,000, more than twice the primary production value. Other things add to this value, beyond the paddy fields themselves. These include trees, both broadleaf and conifer. Taiwan's trees have not been felled for more than a decade now, with 99 percent of our supply of wood coming from imports. This puts the primary production value of the nation's trees at close to zero. But it must be remembered that our tree stock is growing year by year, as is the potential wood available for use. Is it really true, then, that the forests are worth nothing? This is a misconception resulting from the fact that the agricultural industry only counts primary production value.
Agriculture in Taiwan has been undervalued ever since the policy of using the sector to spur industry started in 1964. And the way in which farmers and agriculture have been ignored by the government all this time is a shame.
But it serves the council right. When officials in charge of economic and financial policy calculated primary output value in the past, they never explained, or even asked their own experts on agricultural economy to estimate, the value of the secondary and tertiary agricultural sectors. Nor did they ask professors of agriculture to estimate green GDP. Su should enlist the help of university professors and council experts to calculate these figures so that those with decisionmaking power can learn the importance of the agricultural sector and understand that allocating agricultural subsidies makes sense.
Modern agricultural production differs from traditional production. In the era of the knowledge economy, some of the most popular electronics companies turn less than a 5 percent profit, but they produce many types of pollution and consume water and electricity. On the other hand, someone growing black pearl wax apples or cultivating cobia fish can earn 20 percent or 30 percent profits.
People who work in the high-tech industry, economists, lawyers and rich people in general, can thank the agricultural sector for the fact that they are able to enjoy scenic spots in agricultural areas. While national unemployment figures are on the rise, rural villages often serve as a buffer zone and help to promote social order. It is not just idle talk when we say that the modern agriculture industry works for the good of everyone.
Yang Ping-shih is a professor in the College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Paul Cooper and Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS