On April 20, Minister of Agriculture Su Jia-chyuan (
In Japan, the primary output value of every single hectare of paddy field is estimated to be some NT$360,000. But these paddy fields also hold water reserves rich in nutrients, store rainwater and flood waters, and provide a natural habitat for wild animals. They can also absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and can be used for recreational and educational purposes. The value of all these things added together is what we have come to term "green GDP."
So, how much is this worth? According to estimates by Japanese academics, the figure is approximately NT$800,000, more than twice the primary production value. Other things add to this value, beyond the paddy fields themselves. These include trees, both broadleaf and conifer. Taiwan's trees have not been felled for more than a decade now, with 99 percent of our supply of wood coming from imports. This puts the primary production value of the nation's trees at close to zero. But it must be remembered that our tree stock is growing year by year, as is the potential wood available for use. Is it really true, then, that the forests are worth nothing? This is a misconception resulting from the fact that the agricultural industry only counts primary production value.
Agriculture in Taiwan has been undervalued ever since the policy of using the sector to spur industry started in 1964. And the way in which farmers and agriculture have been ignored by the government all this time is a shame.
But it serves the council right. When officials in charge of economic and financial policy calculated primary output value in the past, they never explained, or even asked their own experts on agricultural economy to estimate, the value of the secondary and tertiary agricultural sectors. Nor did they ask professors of agriculture to estimate green GDP. Su should enlist the help of university professors and council experts to calculate these figures so that those with decisionmaking power can learn the importance of the agricultural sector and understand that allocating agricultural subsidies makes sense.
Modern agricultural production differs from traditional production. In the era of the knowledge economy, some of the most popular electronics companies turn less than a 5 percent profit, but they produce many types of pollution and consume water and electricity. On the other hand, someone growing black pearl wax apples or cultivating cobia fish can earn 20 percent or 30 percent profits.
People who work in the high-tech industry, economists, lawyers and rich people in general, can thank the agricultural sector for the fact that they are able to enjoy scenic spots in agricultural areas. While national unemployment figures are on the rise, rural villages often serve as a buffer zone and help to promote social order. It is not just idle talk when we say that the modern agriculture industry works for the good of everyone.
Yang Ping-shih is a professor in the College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Paul Cooper and Perry Svensson
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS