The US' decision to release five Uighurs -- originally from China's Xinjiang Province -- who were being held in Guantanamo Bay and fly them to Albania for resettlement instead of back to China must be congratulated.
The Bush administration has come in for a lot of deserved criticism for its treatment of so-called "enemy combatants" and the way they have been held indefinitely and without charge in places like Cuba is odious. This, combined with incidents of mistreatment at Abu Ghraib in Iraq, the State Department's redefinition of torture and the secretive rendition flights, have rightly given the US and its "war on terror" a bad name.
However, the way that the US has dealt with the release of the five Uighurs illustrates the difference between a representative democracy with administrative checks and balances and a one-party dictatorship that answers to no one.
The Washington Post has reported that most of the Uighurs held in Guantanamo Bay -- there were about 25 -- had fled persecution in China by escaping to one of the many countries bordering Xinjiang and were taken prisoner either in Pakistan and Afghanistan solely because they were Muslims, foreigners and therefore classed as "insurgents."
The Post also detailed how at least five of them simply happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and were picked up by Pakistani bounty hunters who sold them to US forces.
That these men had remained captive in Guantanamo for more than two years after being cleared of any charges is shocking, but not so surprising when you consider that this was because the US has been actively seeking safe havens for them instead of sending them back to China. They have been rejected by 25 countries so far. In doing so the US has probably saved their lives and has also proved that it still has some semblance of respect for basic human rights.
The reason given by the US for its decision on these five Uighur men was that it believed they would have been "persecuted" upon their return to China. Beijing may be a signatory to the UN's human-rights treaties and conventions, but its record on human-rights transgressions is well documented.
The communist leadership has used the US-led "war on terror" to crack down on Xinjiang separatists under the pretense that any Muslim who advocates a separate identity for Xinjiang must be a terrorist. The term al-Qaeda that is conveniently applied to all Muslim people struggling for a cause these days has also provided Beijing with a "blank check" in its fight against these people.
Aside from Xinjiang, Beijing has also ruled Tibet with an iron fist since its invasion in 1949, and has systematically tortured Tibetan monks, nuns and civilians for their refusal to denounce the Dalai Lama.
And more recently, Beijing has been in the news for allegedly harvesting organs from Falun Gong practitioners.
Anybody who held any illusions about China's human-rights record must be left in no doubt after this most recent episode.
It proves that anyone who opposes the policies and aims of the Chinese government is likely to meet with an unsavory end.
It also makes one wonder what would be in store for Taiwanese independence activists were Taiwan ever to be "unified" with China.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS