The US' decision to release five Uighurs -- originally from China's Xinjiang Province -- who were being held in Guantanamo Bay and fly them to Albania for resettlement instead of back to China must be congratulated.
The Bush administration has come in for a lot of deserved criticism for its treatment of so-called "enemy combatants" and the way they have been held indefinitely and without charge in places like Cuba is odious. This, combined with incidents of mistreatment at Abu Ghraib in Iraq, the State Department's redefinition of torture and the secretive rendition flights, have rightly given the US and its "war on terror" a bad name.
However, the way that the US has dealt with the release of the five Uighurs illustrates the difference between a representative democracy with administrative checks and balances and a one-party dictatorship that answers to no one.
The Washington Post has reported that most of the Uighurs held in Guantanamo Bay -- there were about 25 -- had fled persecution in China by escaping to one of the many countries bordering Xinjiang and were taken prisoner either in Pakistan and Afghanistan solely because they were Muslims, foreigners and therefore classed as "insurgents."
The Post also detailed how at least five of them simply happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and were picked up by Pakistani bounty hunters who sold them to US forces.
That these men had remained captive in Guantanamo for more than two years after being cleared of any charges is shocking, but not so surprising when you consider that this was because the US has been actively seeking safe havens for them instead of sending them back to China. They have been rejected by 25 countries so far. In doing so the US has probably saved their lives and has also proved that it still has some semblance of respect for basic human rights.
The reason given by the US for its decision on these five Uighur men was that it believed they would have been "persecuted" upon their return to China. Beijing may be a signatory to the UN's human-rights treaties and conventions, but its record on human-rights transgressions is well documented.
The communist leadership has used the US-led "war on terror" to crack down on Xinjiang separatists under the pretense that any Muslim who advocates a separate identity for Xinjiang must be a terrorist. The term al-Qaeda that is conveniently applied to all Muslim people struggling for a cause these days has also provided Beijing with a "blank check" in its fight against these people.
Aside from Xinjiang, Beijing has also ruled Tibet with an iron fist since its invasion in 1949, and has systematically tortured Tibetan monks, nuns and civilians for their refusal to denounce the Dalai Lama.
And more recently, Beijing has been in the news for allegedly harvesting organs from Falun Gong practitioners.
Anybody who held any illusions about China's human-rights record must be left in no doubt after this most recent episode.
It proves that anyone who opposes the policies and aims of the Chinese government is likely to meet with an unsavory end.
It also makes one wonder what would be in store for Taiwanese independence activists were Taiwan ever to be "unified" with China.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS