Due to deliberation over President Chen Shui-bian's (
Some pan-blue politicians and media outlets, however, have rejoiced in this diplomatic failure and made sarcastic comments to humiliate Chen. These people care nothing for Taiwan's dignity or the feelings of the nation's 23 million citizens. Their cooperation with China in its attempts to suppress Taiwan internationally makes us wonder whether or not they have any conscience at all.
The fact that Chen did not transit in the US must be seen as a step back for US-Taiwan relations. The nation's diplomats must take responsibility for their inability to negotiate and blunt the impact on Taiwan's diplomatic space. The US, however, needs China's cooperation in dealing with the Iran nuclear crisis, Sudan and North Korea, and thus does not want Taiwan to "rock the boat," possibly inciting a dispute between the Washington and Beijing at this critical juncture. Taiwan will have to forgive the US for the limits imposed on our friendship by international considerations.
The decision to bypass the US, then, is simply a pragmatic and intelligent way to minimize problems for Taiwan's most important ally. We must, however, remind the US that although China likes to talk about a "peaceful rise," the country's saber rattling, expanding arsenal and despotic treatment of its own citizens is casting a shadow over world peace and stability.
The US should deal with this by offering more support to Taiwan -- another democratic country -- and strengthening the US-Japan security alliance. This is the only way to maintain regional peace. Giving in too much to China's threats is the same as letting the fox into the henhouse, and it will lead to disaster.
The main reason for Chen's humiliation is that China is doing its utmost to suppress Taiwan internationally. Every Taiwanese, regardless of their political views, should treat China as an enemy and condemn its brutish behavior. It is shameful to see how some pan-blue camp politicians and media outlets refuse to abandon their personal antipathy toward Chen when dealing with issues of national interest and dignity. Instead, they laugh at Chen's situation on the airwaves and in the Legislative Yuan and even demanding that he apologize to the public.
These people forget that it is China's suppression of Taiwan that is responsible for the nation's weak international position, and that China is the aggressor and Taiwan the victim. What kind of logic is it that dictates that the victim should apologize after being violated by an aggressor? There is, in fact, nothing wrong with these people, it's just that they don't recognize or identify with Taiwan. They live in Taiwan but have no feelings for the place, and this is the reason for their strange behavior.
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
Premier Su Tseng-chang (
In 1994, while still president, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) once lamented "the tragedy of being born Taiwanese." The fact is that the tragedy of being Taiwanese originates with China: Taiwan's earlier lack of democracy was the result of oppression by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and Taiwan's independence and sovereignty is now being threatened by China. Taiwan's democratization process rid us of a dictator that came here from China, and it has allowed the Taiwanese people to live in a land of freedom and democracy.
But, Taiwan's localization movement is still plagued by the nightmare of Chinese threats, and Chen's stopover in the US was clearly blocked because of China's underhanded dealings. Most people in Taiwan are, however, quite clear on the motives of those pan-blue politicians standing on the sidelines laughing, making irresponsible statements and agreeing with everything China says and does.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of