If you were a US president and wanted to give Taiwan a diplomatic smackdown, what would you do?
You can't cut ties because officially they don't exist. Public rebukes of a democratic leader don't play well when your supposed God-given mission is spreading the Gospel of Freedom worldwide. Halting arms sales would expose you to vicious attacks from the neocon and commie-hating right -- not to mention stirring up a hornet's nest of irate defense contractors who would lose lucrative contracts. And besides, the pan-blue camp's doing a good enough job stopping such deals anyway.
There's not much a US president can do, frankly. You're left with petty diplomatic knuckle-rapping -- but that seems to sting Taiwan plenty.
I'm referring, of course, to Uncle Sam's eleventh-hour decision last week that President Chen Shui-bian (
As media reports pointed out, it's the chilliest treatment a Taiwanese president has received from the US since Lee Teng-hui (
God only knows what get-up Chen would have chosen to express his displeasure. Perhaps a fruit hat -- and nothing else. At any rate, a miffed Chen decided to pick up his toys and find other kids to play with -- in the United Arab Emirates.
So what's the big deal about Chen's trips to the US, anyway? As The Associated Press patiently explained for the umpteenth time: "China considers self-governed Taiwan as part of its territory and frowns on any visits by its leaders that might imply Taiwanese sovereignty."
Now, I understand the need to write in language that a six-year-old could understand -- after all, that's the reading level of most Americans (the AP's home audience), if recent education statistics are to be believed. But wouldn't it be nice sometimes to read something more accurate? Something along the lines, of, oh, I don't know: "China, which has a delusional view of history and is in deep collective denial, considers Taiwan part of its territory -- although a claim over Moldova would be about as legitimate. It frowns on anything Taiwan does that might imply reality."
Reuters copy should get a similar makeover. Their explanation, "China ... views any country that plays host to Chen as encouraging his vision of a separate Taiwanese identity," should read as follows: "China views any country that plays host to Chen as encouraging a clear view of Taiwan's status, unmuddied by Beijing's `greater China' propaganda."
And does Reuters really have to rub it in about our diplomatic allies? "Only 26 states -- mostly small, poor countries -- recognize Taipei instead of Beijing." They might as well write, "Only 26 states -- mostly tin-can, pissant places that by all rights shouldn't even be called countries, the bottom of the barrel, the riff-raff of the international community -- recognize Taipei instead of Beijing."
What about the feelings of the 11,810 people of Tuvalu? Or does Reuters not care about them?
And let's not let die scribblers at Deutsche Presse-Agentur get away unedited either. They wrote: "More than 160 countries recognize China and see Taiwan as China's breakaway province."
I don't think you'd find many US officials who'd call Taiwan a "breakaway province" -- unless China's lobbying efforts in Washington are progressing better than I realize. But never mind. How about: "More than 160 countries do not dispute China's claim over Taiwan due to their shocking historical ignorance, Chiang Kai-shek's (
So much for the wirespeak on why Chen's trips to the US get China's knickers in a twist. But why did the US decide to cave in this time? The media was full of speculation -- the US needs China's help with Iran, it's too soon after Chinese President Hu Jintao's (胡錦濤) trip to Washington, it's payback for Chen's scrapping of the National Unification Council, US President George W. Bush personally thinks Chen is a big doofus. Which is it? All, or none, of the above? Who knows.
Anyway, Taipei should relax, because it could have been worse. Washington could have told Chen to transit through Fargo, North Dakota -- or anywhere in Nebraska. Or to judge by the opinions of a certain letter-writer in Taichung, there's an even worse punishment: Salt Lake City, Utah -- where the US could have made Chen spend a night each way hosted by Mormons. Of course, then you run the distinct danger that the president might be converted en route to Paraguay, with God only knows what diplomatic consequences.
Besides, Taiwan has ample opportunity to exact revenge. The next time the US sends high-ranking pseudo-diplomats to Taipei, the Taiwanese government should make them transit through Puli (
The central government has leapt into action, too. Never mind that this year's recently completed Han Kuang military exercises were halted when the simulated Chinese army made it to Taipei by rolling almost unopposed down the Yangjin Highway. No, there are more pressing priorities: such as making Japanese tourists happier -- which is why the government has declared a "War on Dog Droppings."
Fine, but here's my advice: Don't clean up Puli too much, because it may soon be hosting US officials.
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS