Following Chinese President Hu Jintao's (胡錦濤) unsuccessful visit to the US, we can expect him to change his image of "incompetence" by taking an even tougher stance on certain issues. Apart from giving up its pretence of being neutral on the Iran issue in favor of opposing the US, China is also taking a hard stance on the issue of religion, as a conflict has broken out between China and the Vatican over the appointments of bishops.
Sino-Vatican relations had been improving in the past few years, especially after Pope Benedict XVI took his post last year. According to Cardinal Joseph Zen (陳日君) -- the Vatican's top appointee in Hong Kong -- the two countries could establish diplomatic ties at any time. Because the Vatican had decided to sacrifice its diplomatic ties with Taiwan in favor of China, China only had to allow the Vatican to appoint Chinese bishops.
The two sides had been appointing bishops together for some time -- examples include Joseph Xing (邢文之), the auxiliary bishop of the Shanghai archdiocese, Anthony Dang (黨明彥), the auxiliary bishop of the Xian archdiocese, Paul He (何澤清), the auxiliary bishop of the Wanzhou archdiocese, and most recently Joseph Xu (徐宏根), the bishop of the Suzhou archdiocese who took up his post last month.
However, China's state-backed Catholic Church -- the China Patriotic Catholic Association -- appointed Ma Yinglin (馬英林) and Liu Xinhong (劉新紅) as bishops without papal approval on Sunday and Wednesday, respectively. Although the Vatican requested a delay for deliberation, Beijing insisted on going its own way to assert its sovereignty. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) even argued that it had not received Zen's faxes conveying the Holy See's opinion, a trick Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (海基會) is familiar with. Whenever the Foundation wants to discuss something with China's Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (海協會) that the Association does not want to hear about, the phone simply rings out.
It was just a matter of time before a conflict between China and the Vatican breaks out, because the CCP has always seen religion as a kind of dissidence. Of course, in these times of globalization, Beijing has no choice but to practice a dual tactic: Arresting religious believers on the one hand, while pretending to boost religious freedom on the other hand.
On the eve of Hu's US visit, in addition to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-CCP Economic and Trade Forum, China held its first buddhist forum in Zhejiang Province to show off its "religious freedom" to the US. But observers pointed out that the purpose of the CCP's "united front" strategy is drive a wedge between and within people of faith, pitting Buddhism against Catholicism, Tibetan Buddhism against more mainstream practices, and so on. Speakers publicly condemned the Dalai Lama at the Zhejiang forum. A Taiwanese master also turned up to show the unity of faith across the strait. The politicized CCP version of religion is alien to how most people around the world understand their faith.
In Vietnam, another communist country, a celebration was held last November to mark the consecration of its 57th bishop, chosen by the Vatican. That is real globalization and the beginning of religious freedom.
The conflict between China and the Vatican continues as Zen and the Chinese Church rebuke each other. But after Ma's consecration in the Kunming archdiocese of Yunnan Province last Sunday, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused the Vatican of being unreasonable, and Zen of having seriously damaged relations between the two nations.
How will the story develop? Let's wait and see.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS