Beijing's decision to ordain two bishops without papal consent shows that maintaining control over the Catholic Church in China is more important than restoring ties with the Vatican, analysts say.
The consecrations of priests Ma Yinglin (
China's officially atheist Communist Party rulers have long insisted on two conditions for resuming relations -- that the Vatican end diplomatic ties with Taiwan, its arch-rival, and does not interfere in its internal affairs.
Talks had appeared to gain momentum before this week's ordinations. Hong Kong Cardinal Joseph Zen (
Richard Madsen, a China-Vatican relations expert at the University of California, San Diego, also pointed to the compromise reached between the Holy See and Beijing on the appointment of three bishops last year.
"The bishops appointed last year, including, very significantly, the bishop for Shanghai, were done with Vatican approval. These involve delicate informal discussions," Madsen said. "The fact that agreement could be reached, especially about the bishop for Shanghai, was a good sign that it would be possible for Beijing and the Vatican to reach a formal accommodation."
"If Beijing wanted to keep the negotiations moving forward, it wouldn't have now appointed bishops who are blatantly unacceptable to the Vatican. ... It is unclear to me that Beijing wants negotiations to go forward at this time," he said.
The biggest hurdle is Beijing's wish to retain authority over China's Roman Catholics and essentially over all religion in the country, China expert Dorian Malovic wrote in his book The Yellow Pope.
"The main issue for Beijing is to be able to build a new religious policy for the whole country, especially for the Catholics," Malovic wrote. "The establishment of diplomatic relations with the Vatican would automatically involve very deep reform of the role of the political structure that has been in place to control religion."
A majority of 79 bishops appointed by China are already indirectly recognized by the Vatican anyway, Malovic and other analysts said.
So the real issue is not how bishops are selected but who controls the Church, they said.
Some experts said the recent appointments could be an attempt by China's government-appointed agency in charge of Catholic affairs -- the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association -- to retain its power.
"I do not think it is correct to speak about Beijing here," said Benoit Vermander, a China-Vatican expert at the Ricci Institute in Taiwan. "Rather, we should speak about the Catholic Patriotic Association, which has its own agenda, namely defending its administrative position and its privileges within the regime. It is responsible for the appointment of bishops."
However, Beatrice Leung (梁潔芬), an expert at Taiwan's Wenzao Ursuline College, disagreed.
"If it's just Ma, then it could be a small move by the Patriotic Association, but it happened a second time, so the central authority must know," she said.
Liu Bainian (
"There are still 44 dioceses in mainland China without bishops. We can't wait until the end of negotiations to appoint bishops. It could take years," he said.
Liu refused to say whether any more bishops would be appointed without the Vatican's consent in the near future.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS