Bank of China (BoC) is not the biggest of that country's Big Four banks -- the institutions groomed by Beijing as the global representatives of the new Chinese financial system -- but it can claim to be the most prestigious.
It bears the country's name, it's the main sponsor of the 2008 Beijing Olympics, and is being prepared for a multibillion-dollar flotation on international capital markets this year. It also has a set of blue-chip international investors, including the Royal Bank of Scotland.
But BoC appears to be at least as vulnerable to fraud as any of the other three, and has caught the headlines -- for all the wrong reasons -- in China and abroad with worrying regularity over recent years, even before the stunning allegations emerging from Las Vegas.
Earlier this month Caijing, the Beijing-published magazine regarded as China's version of The Economist for its impartiality and exposes of financial crime, reported a "new scandal" at the bank.
Several managers of a local sub-branch in the northeastern town of Shuangyashan colluded with a local businessman to defraud the bank of US$54 million in acceptance notes.
The case once again exposed the bank's vulnerability to insider crime, despite attempts to reform and tighten regulation in the wake of a series of similar cases across the country." It is unbelievable that such a small sub-branch can have issued so many bankers' acceptance bills without arousing attention from higher banking authorities," Caijing reported.
Last year, former BoC vice chairman Liu Jinbao (劉金寶) was sentenced to death (later commuted) after stealing US$3 million from one of its Hong Kong branches, and before that former vice president Zhao Ange (趙安歌) got life imprisonment for accepting multimillion-dollar bribes.
Another local manager, Gao Shan (
Beijing's Banking Regulatory Commission ordered BoC to improve its internal risk controls to deal with fraud. The authorities argue that the cases coming before the courts in the US and China show that they are coming to grips with the problem.
Royal Bank of Scotland -- whose chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin sits on BoC's board -- took a 5 percent stake in the bank last year for around ?900 million (US$1.6 billion), and speaks for another 5 percent as part of a consortium of Western investors including US investment bank Merrill Lynch.
A spokesman said: "We are well aware of the press reports regarding the fraud case at the bank and the forthcoming trial in Las Vegas. Clearly it is a matter for BoC. It is well worth remembering that BoC has total assets of US$560 billion."
When Royal Bank negotiated its holding, it insisted on warranties and assurances from the Chinese about any unforeseen financial liabilities. BoC hoped to float on the Hong Kong bourse and possibly a non-Chinese exchange in the first half of this year, but this may be delayed until the fall, banking sources said.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its