"Our side would welcome that debate," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told Democrats, hinting at a floor fight over the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. "And frankly, we'll clean your clock."
The Wall Street Journal told Virginia Republicans that the way to "turn a red state blue" was to act like liberals: "Republicans in that ostensibly `red' Republican state got their clocks cleaned in November's elections after they refused to take a coherent stand on taxes."
Keith McFarland at Business Week recalled that US industries awakened to the need for quality production 20 years ago "primarily because America was getting its clock cleaned by the Japanese."
All three usages of this mysterious slang expression took place this year. Only four years ago, it was analyzed in this space as one of the sports pulverization terms, along with whomp, clobber, slaughter, thrash, trounce, all shunting aside the colorless defeat decisively. The earliest citation then was from 1959, suggesting it was derived from the early 20th-century "fix your clock," using the face of a timepiece to stand for the human face, as in the related insult, a face that would stop a clock.
Comes now this citation from the sports page of the Trenton Evening Times of July 28, 1908, about a couple of local baseball teams: "It took the Thistles just one inning to clean the clocks of the Times boys." That means that this mechanical metaphor has been kicking around for at least nearly a century, most often in sports lingo, now more in combative political language (and occasionally with a sexual overtone regarding being exhausted by one's partner, though I can offer no citation).
And it is being spread around the world: In an article about the portrayal of villains on Japanese television, Kate Elwood wrote three months ago in the Daily Yomiuri of Tokyo that an idealistic teacher named Yankumi "with a certain elan, cleans the clocks of assorted bad guys over many episodes ... way to go, Yankumi!"
Why does Old Slang stay with us long after the basis for the metaphor has staggered off into the mists of meaning? Perhaps alliteration helps give it linguistic longevity; clean your clock comes readily to the tongue, though it has no semantic relation to "wash your face." In the same way, so does drop a dime, as in David Van Biema's recent review in Time magazine of a Coptic Egyptian translation of a supposed 2nd century manuscript irreverently titled The Gospel of Judas. The reviewer writes about the title character famed for his betrayal, "Technically speaking, he did drop a dime on Jesus."
To drop a dime means "to insert a coin into a pay phone to dial the police and inform about a criminal conspiracy." The reviewer's ironic description of a betrayer, whistle-blower, informer, leaker or fink of two millenniums ago uses a communications device a couple of generations out of date. Does anybody under 40 -- who never uses a pay phone, which long ago lost its dial and stopped costing a dime -- get the reference? I presume some people do, because there it is in last week's Time about a dime-dropper who got his clock cleaned by history.
THE LONG WAR
What do we call the war we're in? The Iraqi war? Gulf war II? The war on terror? Global struggle against terrorism? Clash of civilizations?
One unwritten law of war is that every war has to have a name. Pettifoggers in Congress decided to call the Korean War the Korean conflict, because it was a UN "police action" and never officially declared a war, but it's remembered as the Korean War. The 1914-1918 clash of groups of nations was described by an idealistic president Woodrow Wilson as "the war to end war," but events made sure that never stuck; it was initially labeled the Great War, which competed with the World War and did not gain its historical title of World War I, of course, until World War II (the comedian Sid Caesar, dressed in a doughboy's uniform and helmet in a classic skit set in late 1918, exulted anachronistically, "World War I is over!").
Even nonshooting wars get a name. The most memorable political coinage of the post-World War II era was the Cold War, which was often attributed to the superpundit Walter Lippman. I knocked myself loose researching that one, and credit the coinage to the publicist and triple Pulitzer Prize-winner Herbert Bayard Swope, who icily informed Lippman that "I used it first in a little talk I made in '45" and later put it in a 1946 speech he wrote for Bernard Baruch. Swope's secretary produced a 1949 letter from that elder statesman stating, "You coined the expression, and I gave it currency."
One prospect for the name of the hostilities currently in the headlines is the long war. President George W. Bush, in his Jan. 31 State of the Union address, told Congress and the nation: "Our own generation is in a long war against a determined enemy." This previewed the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review Report issued the following month, which cited Bush's Sept. 20, 2001, prediction of "a lengthy campaign" and was titled Fighting the Long War. On Oct. 16, 2003, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld used "a long, hard slog." Evidently long is the Bush administration's adjective of choice.
If the long war catches on, who would be the new Swope? As of now, the coiner is General John Abizaid. "I traveled this month with Abizaid as he visited Iraq and other areas of his command," wrote the Washington Post columnist David Ignatius on Dec. 26, 2004. "Over several days, I heard him discuss his strategy for what he called the Long War to contain Islamic extremism."
Going against the phrase's adoption is its official sponsorship; going for it is the likelihood of war opponents countering in rhyme "long war, wrong war." Let's keep an eye on this one.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS