Now that both major parties have new chairmen in place, the march to 2008 begins. There will be transitional elections on the way, including new legislative elections. The Legislative Yuan has gained considerable power, but both domestic and overseas interest will be focused on the presidential election.
The two groups that fought the 2004 election will be more dominated next time around by the two major parties -- the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Still, the more than two-year period left before the presidential election is a long time politically, and change could easily take place.
Bolstered by momentum from the recent local government elections, the KMT and its new Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) have moved quickly to expand party membership. The new chairman benefits from having a well-known name and a reputation for advocating integrity in politics. This is very useful for his party since the DPP has suffered considerable damage from corruption scandals.
Despite the KMT's own reputation for corruption, ill-gotten funds and its past profile as an authoritarian party, it still benefits from the capabilities of leaders with years of experience, and discipline -- though somewhat diminished -- that keeps the party strong.
Still, there is an entrenched party elite that remains opposed to what the new chairman calls "reform" but which they see as moves to dismantle their strength. Then there are the local (ie, ethnic Taiwanese) members that comprise about 70 percent of the total membership. They have remained loyal to the party, but inevitably are more oriented toward Taiwan than to China. It will not be easy for the new chairman to overcome these differences.
Over the past six years, the KMT's objective has clearly been to destroy the opposition, at whatever cost to the nation. Some now want a party that is more adapted to the democratic system but will still steer the people to accept a more China-oriented agenda.
The DPP has been a ruling party with differing objectives and little experience in governance. It has often been thwarted by the opposition. Its new party chairman is also well known to the voters, and like his KMT counterpart he will experience a great deal of disagreement within his party with little time to overcome the problem.
Unlike the differences within the KMT, which are not so openly discussed, the DPP's culture of debate is more open and less disciplined. Incoming DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun has stated his objectives, one of which is to make the party a central point where the views of the executive branch, the DPP legislative caucus and the Presidential Office are coordinated before action is taken.
Again, like his KMT counterpart, within the next year Yu will have to deal with the Taipei and Kaohsiung mayoral elections and the redistribution of electorates, followed by the legislative elections and the presidential election.
There are domestic and external challenges that each side will have to address. Voters are tired of continuous political activities that do not address their interests. Younger voters seem to take the potential for serious conflict for granted. There is a temptation to simply accept an unclear status quo, but there is also a need to carry out government reform and deal with the external problems that arise from this. An understanding of two issues is likely to influence the result of the next election. These are the strength of the cross-strait relationship and changes in the nation's identity.
Voters have voiced frustration at the continuous gridlock and the failure to implement promised policies. One reason for this is the ambiguity that prevails in each party's explanation of its policies or commitments. This reduces voter confidence in politicians generally.
Equally as important, recent polls indicate that young voters seem to take their freedom for granted without bearing the responsibility of being a member of this community.
China and the US strongly support the status quo in cross-strait relations. The US understandably wants to avoid being caught in a catastrophic war. China is satisfied with the status quo under its present policies, as long as it can continue to undermine Taiwan's ability to work in the international community. Taiwan may avoid war in supporting the status quo, but this is likely to be at the cost of gradually being forced into China's orbit.
Newspaper reports and TV news programs about Hong Kong's struggle with Beijing's behavior and its breaking of commitments made to the people in the territory give the young voters of Taiwan ample understanding of why the concept of "one country, two systems" is not suitable for Taiwan. Creeping into discourse in Taiwan lately has been an old, almost forgotten, principle known as "Asian values." It is even being promoted as a possible system for Taiwan, using Singapore as a model.
The voters of Taiwan may be critical of their politicians, but they would be far more critical if their power was diminished in adopting this mode of thinking.
The final challenge -- dealing with constitutional reform -- goes beyond internal campaigning and debating. Taiwan has changed elements of the Constitution in the past, but the process inevitably led to obstacles that required difficult and time-consuming negotiations.
During the course of the long, unofficial campaign for president issues will change and new topics will surface as others disappear. Two broad issues, however, will likely continue to be influential: the strengthening of cross-strait relations on one hand and the establishment of a Taiwanese entity on the other. One side in this debate wants a closer Taiwan-China relationship, while the other wants to strengthen Taiwan's separate identity. This is not a new debate by any means, and it is hard to imagine that it will be solved any time soon.
But the challenge that has paralyzed progress in Taiwan for six years must be resolved immediately if a free and fair contest can take place in the legislative and presidential elections within the next two years. All parties need to demonstrate leadership and arrive at a consensus, but this must be done as part of a multi-party effort while working for the benefit of all Taiwanese. If not, the challenges facing Taiwan may be more than its freedom and democracy can endure.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and is a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
RSS