Imagine you are an investor focusing on regional markets including Taiwan and decide to review what portfolio would be best for the year. Taiwan would not be the kind of market you would feel excited about because its annual gain of 6.66 percent last year lagged far behind some of its Asian neighbors. South Korea, for instance, saw its stocks surge 53.96 percent last year and was crowned the best performing market in Asia. It was followed by India (42.3 percent), Japan (40.2 percent), Australia (17.6 percent) and Singapore (13.6 percent).
Of course, there are markets whose performances lagged behind Taiwan's. Hong Kong's benchmark index gained a modest 4.5 percent for 2005, while Malaysia's key index fell 0.84 percent from the previous year. Shanghai's index fell 8.3 percent from its 2004 close, its worst year-end close in seven years.
There were a number of negative factors -- surging global oil prices, concerns over avian flu and a persistent domestic political confrontation -- which put pressure on the local market last year. The point is that although Taiwan registered a GDP growth rate of only 2.54 percent in the first quarter of last year, followed by a marginal improvement of 3.6 percent in the second, evidence shows that economic recovery began taking place in the third and that momentum is expected to build this year.
With net purchases of Taiwanese stocks by foreign investors reaching a record NT$719.41 billion (US$21.9 billion) for 2005, the benchmark TAIEX ended the year at 6,548.34 points, its third straight annual rise. According to Taiwan Stock Exchange figures, the total market value of local stocks increased NT$1.7 trillion last year alone. The figures can be translated into an increment of around NT$688,000 for each of the 2.47 million investors who traded shares in this country.
So, what about the market for this year? Apart from the likelihood that capital inflow will continue in the first quarter -- given that the local market still has ample room to catch up with other Asian markets -- a number of GDP forecasts from various institutes confirm that the economy has been on a upward trend since SARS-ridden 2003.
The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics forecasts a growth rate of 4.08 percent for the year, and this estimate is echoed by both Academia Sinica and Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research forecasts with predictions of 4.25 percent and 4.01 percent respectively. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc is even more optimistic, predicting 5.0 percent growth this year.
Generally the economy seems set to fare well this year. But why do the Council for Economic Planning and Development's manufacturer confidence index and the National Central University's consumer confidence index claim that investor confidence will remain relatively weak this year? Perhaps the polls reflect concern over the diminishing trade surplus, continued industrial relocation, rising consumer debt and the cross-strait standoff.
So what should people take into consideration before investing? The strength of the US stock market is a solid starting point since Taipei tends to follow Wall Street -- based on the close trade relationship between companies in both economies. Taking the Alternative Minimum Tax on corporate earnings and the stricter accounting rules contained in the Statements of Financial Accounting Standard No. 34 into consideration is also recommended.
Then there is the cross-strait situation, which is a long way from being resolved. The wisdom of leaders may not be such a safe investment, but the importance of commercial interests will continue to be a dependable buffer against destabilization.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS