Global trade talks opening in Hong Kong next week will seriously test the credibility of the WTO and Pascal Lamy, its director-general.
Expectations for the Dec. 13-18 ministerial meeting have been radically scaled down, reflecting lack of progress in the so-called Doha round of trade negotiations launched in the capital of Qatar in November 2001.
Instead of meeting key deadlines that were set in Doha for opening up world trade, the WTO's 148 members have spent the last four years squabbling over removing tariffs, eliminating quotas and ending farming subsidies.
With divergences persisting, Lamy admits that ministers in Hong Kong will not even try to reach agreement on concrete figures for slashing farm duties and industrial tariffs.
The focus instead will be on trying to break the current negotiating deadlock and getting discussions back on track, he told trade reporters in Brussels recently.
Playing the blame game is dangerous, Lamy warned, adding that instead of pointing accusing fingers at each other, WTO members must start working together to push for free trade.
Replacing confrontation with cooperation will not be easy.
The run-up to the Hong Kong meeting has been marked by increasingly acrimonious exchanges between the EU, the US and developing nations, with each accusing the other of not doing enough in the interest of free trade.
The EU is in the firing line over its offer on agriculture, which the US and Brazil as well as other developing countries say is totally inadequate.
The EU and the US are pressing developing countries to reduce their industrial tariffs and to start opening up their protected services sector.
Least-developed states, meanwhile, have complained that their trading interests are being ignored -- although the current Doha negotiations are supposed to put development first.
Lamy faces an "impossible challenge" as he struggles to reconcile these conflicting interests, says Jean-Pierre Lehmann, professor for international political economy at the International Institute for Management Development in Lausanne, Switzerland.
"Short of a miracle, the chances of anything of substance emerging from Hong Kong are very remote," Lehmann said.
All countries participating in the Doha round have offensive and defensive trading interests. In other words, most engage in a delicate balancing act which requires that they try to trade off access to their own markets by winning entry into the markets of other nations.
For a negotiation to succeed, all sides need to see some gains which they can sell to their respective governments and public.
Putting together all the pieces in this vast WTO jigsaw puzzle of free trade is not easy, Lamy admits.
But being WTO director-general does not mean he can order the organization's members around, he says. All he can do is facilitate discussions and encourage compromises between negotiators.
"It is like being an arbiter, a navigator or even a midwife," Lamy insists.
The stakes for Hong Kong are high. A repetition of the failed WTO meeting in Cancun two years ago could permanently dent the credibility of the multilateral trading system, Lehmann warns.
World business leaders, tired of waiting for progress on the global level, will press their governments to clinch bilateral trade agreements, he says.
The "big danger" if that happens is that discrimination rather than fair treatment for all will become the name of the game, he warns.
While China, India, Brazil and other emerging economies may benefit from the quest for bilateral deals, such a prospect is bad news for poor nations which will be left out of the race.
As recent US and EU efforts to clinch voluntary restraint agreements with China on textiles and footwear illustrate, a resurgence of worldwide protectionism is also possible.
"The serious concern is that in the long-term the WTO could become impotent and irrelevant," Lehmann warns.
Lamy's reputation is also at stake.
The former EU trade chief -- who took over as head of the WTO in September -- has won accolades in Geneva for quickly switching hats and espousing his new role as honest world trade with great enthusiasm.
A breakdown in Hong Kong could cast a shadow over Lamy's next four years in the world trade hot seat. It will also make it difficult to complete the Doha negotiations next year.
Taking the talks into 2007, however, is extremely risky.
For one, the fast-track authority on trade given by Congress to US President George W. Bush is due to expire in mid-2007.
Equally importantly, French presidential elections in 2007 are expected to make it even more difficult for Paris to agree to additional concessions in farm trade.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS