The EU's top trade negotiators face a rough ride at global trade talks opening in Hong Kong next week.
The stakes for Hong Kong are especially high because failure to agree on further cuts in farm subsidies and tariffs would block efforts to reach a global WTO trade pact by the end of next year.
The focus on agriculture is not popular in Brussels. EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson and European Farm Commissioner Mariann Fischer-Boel admit to being angry and frustrated that demands for better access to European agriculture markets are center stage at the WTO.
They insist that attacks on EU farm trade concessions being made by the US, Australia and leading developing nations, including Brazil, are unjustified.
And Mandelson and Fischer-Boel are struggling -- so far unsuccessfully -- to turn world attention away from European farm policies to EU insistence that countries such as Brazil, Mexico, India and Pakistan must start opening up their own markets for industrial goods and services.
"People have exaggerated expectations of what we can do," Mandelson told trade reporters in Brussels recently.
True, the bloc's CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) used to be marked by high import tariffs, vast aid schemes for farmers and export subsidies. But while CAP was a "fat, juicy target" -- criticized for being protectionist and creating huge EU surpluses which were then dumped on world markets -- EU farm policies are now transformed following major internal reforms, Mandelson said.
As a result of the overhaul, the EU has put in an offer at the WTO for further farm trade concessions which is "ambitious and bold," Fischer-Boel said. "But instead of giving the EU credit for revamping its agriculture, the value of our [farm] offer has been underestimated by our partners."
The EU's pre-Hong Kong farm package covers concessions in all three agriculture "pillars" -- market access, domestic aid and export subsidies. The EU has said it is ready to reduce subsidies to its farmers by 70 percent and cut its average farm tariffs from 23 percent to 12 percent. Export subsidies are to be phased out.
"This is the most substantial offer made by the EU in any trade round," Mandelson said.
Others are less impressed, however. Australian Trade Minister Mark Vaile has warned that the EU's failure to make a "meaningful" offer on access to European markets had brought the Doha round to the brink of collapse.
Brazil's Foreign Minister Celso Amorim has been especially critical of the EU concessions, saying the bloc must slash farm import tariffs by 54 percent to satisfy poorer nations' demands for better access to European markets.
Mandelson has responded by warning that the EU will not make any further farm offers next week. He has also accused Brazil of using its clout in the WTO to promote national self-interest.
If Hong Kong is to succeed, negotiations must move beyond agriculture to reciprocal cuts in tariffs in industrial goods and freer trade in services, Mandelson said.
Meanwhile, France, which receives the lion's share of EU farm subsidies, has warned that it will veto any deal struck in Hong Kong if it means additional sacrifices for European farmers.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS