The Dec. 3 local government elections focused attention on the Kaohsiung Rapid Transport Corp (KRTC) scandal, and as the main culprit Chen Che-nan (陳哲男) was formerly the Presidential Office's deputy secretary-general, this made the administration an easy target for the opposition. This was not the only corruption scandal brought to light during the course of the campaign. There was some truth in the torrent of accusations and suspicion that the campaign generated, and the effect was exacerbated by the public's diminished faith in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), who have been inclined to give credence to accusations even when evidence was lacking.
In the last presidential elections, the DPP scrapped through. After their defeat in the legislative elections, the DPP said they would take heed of the lessons taught them by that election, but in fact they did nothing. Not only were they engulfed in corruption scandals, they also failed to remain true to their ideals.
It was only in the run up to the local government elections that some reforms were pushed through, but these were seen as insincere attempts to appeal to the public. Moreover, the same old tactics of smearing opponents once again came to the fore. No wonder the DPP suffered such a thumping defeat last Saturday.
Whether one chooses to call the Dec. 3 elections a skirmish ahead of the 2008 presidential elections, or a "mid-term exam," the DPP was soundly defeated. Moreover, they have not yet been able to disperse the effects of the opposition's smear campaign, which is another defeat.
A number of important DPP candidates graciously accepted defeat, and DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) announced that he will resign to take responsibility. All of this is good democratic behavior, but as for the results of its self-assessment, we'll have to wait and see.
The DPP is a democratic party that is based on a strong Taiwanese identity, and as such I have some suggestions for its future:
Listen to opinion from all levels of the party. The aim is to unify the party and strengthen its ability at self-examination rather than push blame onto others.
Put the interests of Taiwan ahead of those of individuals or party factions. A reshuffle that does not take account of personal connections is important to the rebirth of the party.
Implement reforms that benefit the people and establish a practical schedule. Power must be used to push forward reforms and establish mechanisms to prevent the abuse of power.
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) resigned from his position as DPP chairman in order to separate party and state, but that has not been achieved. Pursuing reforms in government and the party, cooperation and division of labor between party and government could be useful.
The DPP's biggest defeat did not come when former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong visited China, but it followed Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) assuming of the KMT chairmanship, indicating that the public does not really want the government to relax cross-strait policy. The fact that Ma did not invite Lien to the celebrations of the 111th anniversary of the KMT is also a clear indication of his wish to distance himself from Lien's pro-China policy.
The DPP should not misinterpret the message and open the floodgates to China, but rather it should focus on the issue of effective management.
When it has done all this, it should look toward upcoming elections, especially the 2008 presidential poll, determine to follow the will of the people rather than use political tactics when deploying its forces and making its nominations.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS