The US has begun to restore security relations with deeply troubled Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, which sits alongside the vital shipping lanes through the South China Sea in Southeast Asia.
The State Department announced a couple of weeks ago that a ban on defense exports to Indonesia had been lifted.
That was the third step taken over the past year, a ban on non-lethal military exports having been lifted in May and the resumption of military education having been decided in February.
Admiral William Fallon, commanding officer of the Pacific Command, with headquarters in Hawaii, said in an interview that he was pleased with the decision as "it's in our best interests."
The admiral, who had been quietly lobbying the state and defense departments and Congress to adopt a new policy, said his staff and the US Embassy in Jakarta were drawing up lists of "exactly what to do with this opportunity."
Fallon said he didn't want to get out ahead of the process, which will require agreement with Indonesian leaders, but suggested that enhanced maritime security would be a top priority. On a mundane level would come spare parts for US equipment that Indonesia had acquired but which sorely needed repair.
The State Department announcement said the new policy was intended, among other things, to "support US and Indonesian security objectives, including counter-terrorism, maritime security, and disaster relief."
The US, under pressure from human rights activists and Congress, cut security relations with Indonesia in the 1990s to protest Indonesian army abuses during East Timor's struggle for independence. The army had also been accused of abuses against separatists in Aceh at the western end of the archipelago of 6,000 inhabited islands.
"The US remains committed to pressing for accountability for past human rights abuses," the State Department said, "and US assistance will continue to be guided by Indonesia's progress on democratic reform."
Admiral Fallon said several times that his command was "sensitive" to those violations of human rights.
Many US officers have been eager to resume a program called International Military Education and Training (IMET), as it could be the most effective way to influence Indonesian officers on the missions and behavior of the armed forces in a democratic nation.
Indonesia's president, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, may be case in point. He is a retired army general who attended two US military schools and once trained with the 82nd Airborne Division. He is regarded as a reformer who has sought to get Indonesia's armed forces out of politics.
Indonesia's troubles are many: terror led by Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), piracy in nearby waters, the devastation caused by the tsunami last December, and public health threats from avian flu and AIDS.
When Indonesian police raided a JI hideout in early November and killed a leader named Azahari bin Husin, they found the terrorists planning to attack Americans, Australians and other westerners in Jakarta.
"Specifically," the State Department said in a travel warning, "they discovered 35 bombs prepared and ready to use."
The JI, which is allied with al-Qaeda terrorists led by Osama bin Laden, is believed to have set off bombs in Bali in 2002, in a Jakarta hotel in 2003, near the Australian embassy in Jakarta last year and three simultaneous explosions in Bali on Oct. 1.
The terrorists seek to establish a united Islamic state that would comprise Indonesia, Singapore, Muslims in southern Thailand, Malaysia, Brunei and Muslims in the southern Philippines.
Such a state could seek a chokehold on the South China Sea's shipping lanes through which more ships pass each year than those transiting the Suez and Panama canals combined.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS