Even foreign companies are now getting embroiled in the local elections, with the pan-blue camp quoting a recent report by Merrill Lynch. The report stated that if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) fails to win a majority of the county seats, the market will react positively. It went on to explain that a defeat would force them to rethink cross-strait policy. Global Views Monthly also quoted Guy Wittich, chief executive officer of the European Chamber of Commerce, Taipei (ECCT) as saying that it was looking less and less likely Taiwan could become a transit hub for the Asia-Pacific region, an opinion trumpeted by pro-unification factions.
Taiwanese businesspeople want the government to relax regulations and allow them free rein to invest in China, and foreign investors would like to use Taiwan as a springboard into China, using the island when the need is there, and getting out the moment they no longer need it.
So can Taiwan become a transit hub? Far be it from me to throw cold water on the idea, but in recent years Taiwanese ports have seen a drop in the volume of cargo handled, with Kaohsiung falling in global rankings from third place to sixth last year, falling behind other Asian ports such as Shanghai, Shenzhen and Busan, South Korea.
Please, though, do not lay the blame at the feet of the government for holding back on direct flights -- if anyone should take responsibility here, it is those businesspeople who have relocated production to China.
Since production lines have been moved across the Strait there is little cargo left in Taiwan to handle, and with little cargo to handle, cargo ships are not likely to stop here, making instead for Shanghai and Shenzhen to pick up cargo produced there by Taiwanese businesses. Air freight was also hit badly following the move of high-tech manufacturing to China. It really has little to do with direct flights.
Having said that, we should also feel sorry for these foreign investors. This year qualified foreign institutional investors have poured more money into Taiwan's stock market than that of any other Asian country save Japan.
This money, however, cannot make up for losses made due to Taiwanese businesses setting up in China. At present the weighted share price index of the TAIEX is wavering around the 6,200 mark, and for the time being there is no light on the horizon.
Foreign investors are, after all, businesspeople, and the reason they are investing so heavily in Taiwan's stock market is that they want the value of their stocks to increase. They are hoping the government will do something to stimulate the stock market so they can pull out without making a loss. They are putting their hopes in direct flights and a relaxation in the government's current cross-strait policy, which explains Merrill Lynch's report.
The thing is, what businesspeople want is not always in the national interest. According to a government commissioned report, direct flights could save businesses between NT$14 billion and NT$20 billion in transportation costs annually.
However, it would also mean an almost two-fold increase in investment in China (worth around NT$320 billion), which would mean the economy would shrink. Taiwan would also be even less attractive as a transit or distribution center, and if one also takes into account the impact this will have on public security and national defense, it is clear the balance tips against Taiwan.
We could say that the Merrill Lynch report and the comments from ECCT are misinformed, but we cannot blame them, for they are looking at the situation from a Western perspective. The ones we should be blaming are the pro-unification factions who choose to exploit these for their own political interests.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS