Contrary to claims made in your article ("Groups protest `hazardous' cables," Nov. 26, p. 2), there is no credible scientific evidence of health effects from living or working near a mobile-phone base station.
We believe that the article confuses magnetic fields emitted by powered appliances and electrical wiring, which are very different to the radio waves used for communication. The potential impacts of radio frequency energy on human health have been studied in great detail over the past 50 years.
Comprehensive reviews of over 2,200 research publications, including 410 studies specifically on mobile phones and base stations continue to find no substantiated scientific evidence of adverse health effects.
Only recently the World Health Organization (WHO) said that despite the feelings of some people that more research needs to be done, scientific knowledge in this area is now more extensive than for most chemicals. The WHO's fact sheet on radio frequency (RF) emissions states: "None of the recent reviews have concluded that exposure to RF fields from mobile phones and their base stations cause any adverse health consequences."
Also, exclusion zones around residential areas and schools do not reduce public exposure to radio waves and the argument for such zones is scientifically flawed. In fact, a base station sited further from a residential area or school may need to run at a higher power level in order to operate effectively, and this could result in higher exposures at the school.
Michael Milligan
Secretary-general of Mobile
Manufacturers Forum
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS