Contrary to claims made in your article ("Groups protest `hazardous' cables," Nov. 26, p. 2), there is no credible scientific evidence of health effects from living or working near a mobile-phone base station.
We believe that the article confuses magnetic fields emitted by powered appliances and electrical wiring, which are very different to the radio waves used for communication. The potential impacts of radio frequency energy on human health have been studied in great detail over the past 50 years.
Comprehensive reviews of over 2,200 research publications, including 410 studies specifically on mobile phones and base stations continue to find no substantiated scientific evidence of adverse health effects.
Only recently the World Health Organization (WHO) said that despite the feelings of some people that more research needs to be done, scientific knowledge in this area is now more extensive than for most chemicals. The WHO's fact sheet on radio frequency (RF) emissions states: "None of the recent reviews have concluded that exposure to RF fields from mobile phones and their base stations cause any adverse health consequences."
Also, exclusion zones around residential areas and schools do not reduce public exposure to radio waves and the argument for such zones is scientifically flawed. In fact, a base station sited further from a residential area or school may need to run at a higher power level in order to operate effectively, and this could result in higher exposures at the school.
Michael Milligan
Secretary-general of Mobile
Manufacturers Forum
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS