As the intrigue surrounding the Lafayette scandal deepens, it is easy to lose sight of the larger issues at stake. This is especially true in the run-up to tomorrow's local government elections as various officials attempt to politicize the details of the scandal.
The latest spurt of effort in the investigation into the 12-year-old saga comes as authorities begin digging through information supplied by the Swiss government, which released the files last month.
The new information includes details about a number of bank accounts suspected of being used to channel kickbacks to a variety of people. This has led to a series of accusations against a wide array of officials both inside and outside Taiwan, including former president Lee Teng-hui (
The scandal erupted after the murder of navy Captain Yin Ching-feng (
Former premier Hau has even filed a lawsuit against four prominent DPP officials after he became the target of their allegations. Hau, it was claimed, masterminded the Lafayette deal -- supposedly without the knowledge of then-president Lee. Hau traveled to France in 1989, and recommended that Taiwan purchase the frigates, as opposed to South Korean-made ships, after he returned.
The DPP has claimed that the ensuing morass of kickbacks, corruption and murder all occurred without the knowledge of former president Lee. But making such a claim makes little sense in any context other than election gimmickry.
If the Lafayette scandal does involve millions of dollars being funneled to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), arms dealers and French, Taiwanese and Chinese officials, as the DPP claimed, then surely it is wrong to rule out anyone before all the facts are known.
The real problem with making obviously politicized claims in this important investigation is that it weakens the ability of investigators to target dirty officials.
It is a simple case of crying wolf -- if people see that lawmakers are trying to manipulate the investigation's details for political gain, how will they know when something serious has come to light?
Most importantly, the investigation into the Lafayette scandal should provide an opportunity to root out the vestiges of the corrupt authoritarian era and strengthen Taiwan's democratization. It should not be viewed as merely an excuse to further divide public opinion and exacerbate the current political stalemate.
Of course it is possible that the KMT benefited directly from the Lafayette kickbacks. But as we are seeing with the DPP's difficulties over the Kaohsiung MRT scandal, graft is not solely a pan-blue curse.
Most importantly, it is the responsibility of politicians from both the pan-green and pan-blue camps to remember that they now have a chance to right a years-old wrong and avenge the brutal, cold-blooded murder of a man who swore to defend his country, and died trying to expose those who would weaken it.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS