With around 50 to 60 percent of the nation's banking assets controlled by state-run entities, financial regulators are under pressure to meet President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) ambitious goal of halving the number of state banks to six by the end of this year. Though consolidation tops the government's financial reform agenda as a way to increase the competitiveness of local banks, the pace of merger activity has been slow, despite some merger and acquisition deals being sealed in the past few years.
Minister of Finance Lin Chuan's (
Taiwan Business Bank is the nation's ninth-largest lender by assets, with a market share of 4.1 percent and a distribution network of 125 branch offices. It is 41 percent owned by the Ministry of Finance and a few other state banks. Though it has the political mission of granting loans to small and medium-sized enterprises, the bank's market share in this niche is only 12 percent due to strong competition. But because of its past weakness in credit appraisal in its role as a funding channel for particular economic sectors, this lender has lost an average of NT$1.6 per share in each of the past four years.
Critics are concerned that the ministry's failure to sell its stake in Taiwan Business Bank may lead to a more cautious approach by potential buyers of domestic banks, given higher-than-expected integration risks such as strained labor relations. Market observers also worry that the four-day work stoppage by the bank's union could inspire other state bank unions to follow suit and obstruct mergers in the future. Chang Hwa Commercial Bank's (
Moreover, the Taiwan Business Bank incident has caught lawmakers' attention, and may prompt them to demand reviews of every government proposal on disposing of state bank shares. It will certainly increase uncertainty for investors and make it more difficult to reach Chen's target.
The planned privatization of the Central Trust of China (
Even so, the government should learn something from the incident and act to respond to investors' demands for a more open and transparent bidding process. Most importantly, the government needs to convince the market of its political will to proceed with privatization. If the government stops pushing forward, the market will take it as a sign that something is terribly wrong with the policy.
Labor disputes may have been the straw that broke the camel's back as far as Taiwan Business Bank is concerned. But even before those troubles, the bank's poor asset quality and performance made potential buyers far underbid the finance ministry's price targets.
This should teach both management and employees the lesson that their main responsibility is to strengthen the bank's operating efficiency, because successfully privatizing the bank is in the entire nation's interest. Anyone who jeopardizes that privatization and thus hurts the bank's business returns will therefore not be forgiven, even if they do so in the name of job security.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS