A decade after he was picked by the exiled Dalai Lama for the second-highest position in Tibetan Buddhism, 16-year-old Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is a virtual non-person in his Himalayan homeland.
As the 11th Panchen Lama, Gedhun should have been residing at Tashilhunpo Monastery in Shigatse, but in this city even his image is banned, and officials appointed by China deny he has any authority.
"We have never accepted the little boy recognized by the Dalai Lama," said Pingla, a senior cleric at the monastery, who like many Tibetans has only one name. "He was chosen in violation of religious policy and historical ritual."
Still only a teenager, Gedhun has been caught up in a struggle over the future of Tibet, waged between the Dalai Lama, who has lived abroad since 1959, and China, which has ruled the region unchallenged in the same period.
"For Tibetans themselves, maintaining loyalty to Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is often a way to express their loyalty for the Dalai Lama," said Kate Saunders, the Washington-based spokeswoman for the International Campaign for Tibet.
It is a clash of wills that began in May 1995, with an announcement by the Dalai Lama from his residence in the Indian hill town of Dharamsala that Gedhun was the reincarnation of the 10th Panchen Lama, who had died six years earlier.
China's government, apparently fearing loss of control over Tibet's religion and the hearts and minds of its people, immediately moved Gedhun to a secret location.
Ten years have passed, and Gedhun has still not re-emerged because, according to the official Chinese version, he and his family "do not wish to be disturbed" by foreign media.
During Gedhun's decade in hiding, Beijing has been touting its own rival candidate for the 11th Panchen Lama, a boy called Gyaincain Norbu, in a campaign that seems to have left no part of Tibet unaffected.
Intimidation
In the chapels of Pelkor Chode Monastery, a two-hour drive from Shigatse, large photos of the Beijing-sanctioned Panchen Lama abound.
But when one of the monks was asked if the monastery also had images of the boy favored by the Dalai Lama, he made a telling gesture.
He pointed to a young man sitting a few meters away who appeared to be a plainclothes security officer, and brought his hands together by the wrists as if tied with handcuffs.
Despite the intimidation, many Tibetans refer to Gyaincain as Panchen Zuma or the "fake Panchen," and ordinary Shigatse residents display little emotion or enthusiasm for him even though he has been to visit several times.
"He is still just a kid," one of them said when asked what impression the boy had left during his earlier stays in Shigatse.
Others remarked on the stark contrast between the public feelings for Gyaincain and those for his predecessor, the 10th Panchen Lama.
"In the old days, when the 10th Panchen Lama reigned, ordinary people would pour into the Tashilhunpo Monastery to revere him. Now when the 11th Panchen Lama visits the Tashilhunpo, they have to be ordered to go, or they will be fined by the government," said an ethnic Tibetan shop owner in Shigatse.
Genuine
Officials in the Chinese administration say there is no doubt their Panchen Lama is the real one.
"He is not a stooge. With the guidance of eminent monks, he has made great progress. He's a genius," said Panba Tsering, an ethnic Tibetan and the vice director of the Shigatse People's Congress, or mini-legislature.
The Shigatse government is now getting ready to receive the boy genius at his Summer Palace, situated on the outskirts of the city, close to a People's Liberation Army barracks.
The 160-year-old palace -- an example of traditional Tibetan architecture with flat roofs, slightly inward-sloping walls, and stark yellow, green and red colors -- is covered in scaffolding, but not for much longer.
"We have to finish by the end of August," said one of the workers, his skin burnt a deep brown by the high-altitude Tibetan sun.
According to Panba Tsering of the Shigatse People's Congress, the Beijing-sanctioned Panchen Lama may visit again around Sept, 1, which is the 40th anniversary of Tibet as a Chinese autonomous region.
The visit could be a sign that Beijing is intensifying its campaign to force Tibetan acceptance of its Panchen Lama.
In November, authorities arranged a gathering of senior Buddhist clerics in northwestern Qinghai Province to urge them to step up their support for Gyaincain, and in February, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The stakes are getting higher, and some see the Panchen controversy as a dress rehearsal for what will happen once the 70-year-old Dalai Lama passes away, plunging his followers into a race with Beijing to pick a successor.
But for now, the message that permeates the official Chinese propaganda is simple and clear-cut.
"We can only have one Panchen Lama, not two," said Pingla, the cleric at the Tashilhunpo Monastery.
While few Tibetans are likely to disagree, the real issue is exactly which Panchen Lama they have in mind.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS