A decade after he was picked by the exiled Dalai Lama for the second-highest position in Tibetan Buddhism, 16-year-old Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is a virtual non-person in his Himalayan homeland.
As the 11th Panchen Lama, Gedhun should have been residing at Tashilhunpo Monastery in Shigatse, but in this city even his image is banned, and officials appointed by China deny he has any authority.
"We have never accepted the little boy recognized by the Dalai Lama," said Pingla, a senior cleric at the monastery, who like many Tibetans has only one name. "He was chosen in violation of religious policy and historical ritual."
Still only a teenager, Gedhun has been caught up in a struggle over the future of Tibet, waged between the Dalai Lama, who has lived abroad since 1959, and China, which has ruled the region unchallenged in the same period.
"For Tibetans themselves, maintaining loyalty to Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is often a way to express their loyalty for the Dalai Lama," said Kate Saunders, the Washington-based spokeswoman for the International Campaign for Tibet.
It is a clash of wills that began in May 1995, with an announcement by the Dalai Lama from his residence in the Indian hill town of Dharamsala that Gedhun was the reincarnation of the 10th Panchen Lama, who had died six years earlier.
China's government, apparently fearing loss of control over Tibet's religion and the hearts and minds of its people, immediately moved Gedhun to a secret location.
Ten years have passed, and Gedhun has still not re-emerged because, according to the official Chinese version, he and his family "do not wish to be disturbed" by foreign media.
During Gedhun's decade in hiding, Beijing has been touting its own rival candidate for the 11th Panchen Lama, a boy called Gyaincain Norbu, in a campaign that seems to have left no part of Tibet unaffected.
Intimidation
In the chapels of Pelkor Chode Monastery, a two-hour drive from Shigatse, large photos of the Beijing-sanctioned Panchen Lama abound.
But when one of the monks was asked if the monastery also had images of the boy favored by the Dalai Lama, he made a telling gesture.
He pointed to a young man sitting a few meters away who appeared to be a plainclothes security officer, and brought his hands together by the wrists as if tied with handcuffs.
Despite the intimidation, many Tibetans refer to Gyaincain as Panchen Zuma or the "fake Panchen," and ordinary Shigatse residents display little emotion or enthusiasm for him even though he has been to visit several times.
"He is still just a kid," one of them said when asked what impression the boy had left during his earlier stays in Shigatse.
Others remarked on the stark contrast between the public feelings for Gyaincain and those for his predecessor, the 10th Panchen Lama.
"In the old days, when the 10th Panchen Lama reigned, ordinary people would pour into the Tashilhunpo Monastery to revere him. Now when the 11th Panchen Lama visits the Tashilhunpo, they have to be ordered to go, or they will be fined by the government," said an ethnic Tibetan shop owner in Shigatse.
Genuine
Officials in the Chinese administration say there is no doubt their Panchen Lama is the real one.
"He is not a stooge. With the guidance of eminent monks, he has made great progress. He's a genius," said Panba Tsering, an ethnic Tibetan and the vice director of the Shigatse People's Congress, or mini-legislature.
The Shigatse government is now getting ready to receive the boy genius at his Summer Palace, situated on the outskirts of the city, close to a People's Liberation Army barracks.
The 160-year-old palace -- an example of traditional Tibetan architecture with flat roofs, slightly inward-sloping walls, and stark yellow, green and red colors -- is covered in scaffolding, but not for much longer.
"We have to finish by the end of August," said one of the workers, his skin burnt a deep brown by the high-altitude Tibetan sun.
According to Panba Tsering of the Shigatse People's Congress, the Beijing-sanctioned Panchen Lama may visit again around Sept, 1, which is the 40th anniversary of Tibet as a Chinese autonomous region.
The visit could be a sign that Beijing is intensifying its campaign to force Tibetan acceptance of its Panchen Lama.
In November, authorities arranged a gathering of senior Buddhist clerics in northwestern Qinghai Province to urge them to step up their support for Gyaincain, and in February, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The stakes are getting higher, and some see the Panchen controversy as a dress rehearsal for what will happen once the 70-year-old Dalai Lama passes away, plunging his followers into a race with Beijing to pick a successor.
But for now, the message that permeates the official Chinese propaganda is simple and clear-cut.
"We can only have one Panchen Lama, not two," said Pingla, the cleric at the Tashilhunpo Monastery.
While few Tibetans are likely to disagree, the real issue is exactly which Panchen Lama they have in mind.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its