Japan, in its recent national defense white paper, urged caution over China's military expansionism. Over the course of the past 17 years, the percentage increase of China's military expenditure has been measured in double digits. This year the budget was 244.7 billion yuan (more than US$30 billion), an increase of 12 percent from last year. Nevertheless, these figures are actually just the tip of the iceberg, as many items on the budget have been buried in figures for military equipment and weapons research and development.
At the same time, in order to ensure that its maritime supply lines, particularly for oil and gas, are not in danger of being cut off by any foreign power, China sees the need to strengthen its navy and air force. This is seen as important to provide a stable, reliable basis for the nation's rise. According to the Japanese white paper, China has been building submarines and rapidly modernizing its military, as well as developing its air force's mid-air refuelling capabilities and early-warning systems. These are all in preparation for having a military presence in the Pacific Ocean.
China's rise is now an indisputable fact. Although the Chinese rhetoric focuses on how the next two decades are to be devoted to economic development, the discussion about a "peaceful rise" has cleverly cloaked Beijing's expansionist ambitions. The past several years have seen China purchasing advanced military equipment from Russia, and attempting to import weapons from EU countries. This is surely enough to reveal its ambitions to extend overseas, and to become a dominant force in the Asia-Pacific region.
The rise of China has also precipitated a power struggle in the Asia-Pacific. China's influence in this region is gradually increasing due to its rapid economic and military growth. At the same time, this is squeezing out Taiwan, making it more difficult for the nation to compete on the international stage. It threatens Taiwan by refusing to rule out military action, even as it engages in an all-encompassing, multi-faceted war of attrition, manipulating law, public opinion and psychology.
Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Faced with this considerable external threat, Taiwan doesn't even have the advantage of a common consensus of opposition, and the pro-Beijing political parties are vying to get Taiwanese agricultural products exported to China independent of our own government, helping China undermine Taipei's authority.
In the face of the ever-increasing military threat from China, the pro-Beijing parties are holding up the passage of the budget which will enable Taiwan to buy US weapons. This is little short of encouraging China to invade Taiwan, and then to expand into the Asia-Pacific region. The repercussions of all this are very worrying indeed.
Given the threat that exists from China, Taiwan should form an Asia-Pacific security community with the US and Japan, to deal with Beijing's military rise. Without strength there is no peace, but Taiwan should neither engage in a senseless mutual escalation with China, nor tie the question of security within the Taiwan Strait to whether or not China will invade Taiwan.
The best way to avoid and prevent an attack from China is for the entire population of Taiwan to demonstrate the resolve and willingness to protect their homeland. This is what is meant by the terms "civilian-based defense" and "psychological defense."
Shu Chin-chiang is chairman of the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS