The Migrating Birds Program organized by the NSC really gives every Taiwanese overseas student a chance to come back to Taiwan and recognize the earth which is so close to us, and which now seems even a bit closer by having seen it from a distance.
Recently, all of the criticism that has been directed toward the NSC program and its participants is not fair, especially for the staff of the NSC, who has been working very hard to create various internship positions to suit every student, and to locate convenient accommodation for them.
For example, as for myself, I was luckily accepted in the product assurance division at the National Space Organization (formerly known as the National Space Program Office, or NSPO). I got my first working experience in Taiwan. I wake up at 5:15am, take a shuttle bus to Hsinchu and start working at 7:45am and finish at 5pm. I am treated equally, as every colleague at work is treated. Our division chief gathers everyone for a daily meeting at 8:30am. He is a very knowledgeable person from whom I have learned a lot about satellites from a product assurance point of view. Before coming to NSPO, a mentor was assigned in each field and a program was tailor-made for each intern, and they constantly asked us if adjustments needed to be made to the program.
I believe the NSC, NSPO and any other organizations involved in this program take it very seriously, and so does every participant. I know the media have a lot of questions about the organization of the program, but I suggest that they highlight the benefits of this program and support it in the future.
After this wonderful experience, I truly believe most of us will become better ambassadors for Taiwan in the country we currently live and in the school we go to. We will be even more proud of ourselves because we know more about where we are from. Perhaps, one day we will return to Taiwan and contribute our best to a land which we feel we are proud to belong to.
Chen Ting-ming
Montreal, Canada
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers