Next month President Chen Shui-bian (
He has invited the leaders of the four main political parties, Taipei Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman-elect Ma Ying-jeou (
His purpose in doing this is to achieve a foreign policy consensus among the major political parties to more effectively resist China's attempts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically.
Predictably, the green camp has been eager to fall in with the president's plans, while the blue camp has shown a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Ma has said that he is too busy, while PFP spokesperson Hsieh Kung-ping (
He said that while international diplomacy is important, more immediate questions -- the cross-strait issue, the economy and domestic issues -- are in complete disarray, and the president should give priority to these urgent matters which impinge directly on the lives of the Taiwanese people.
Shu said he fully approved of the president's invitation to opposition leaders to help make diplomatic headway. Su also enthusiastically endorsed the president's move, saying that by inviting opposition leaders, we could show our allies Taiwan's democratic achievements and the unity of the Taiwanese people.
He added that even if the political parties had domestic differences, they should stand together when overseas.
He also scolded Ma, saying that while it was essential to keep abreast of domestic administration, promoting Taiwan's foreign policy was also essential.
What results a joint delegation of Taiwan's political leaders might achieve on the diplomatic front remains to be seen, but this must certainly be recognized as something of a first in international diplomacy and an imaginative attempt by the government to break out of the diplomatic isolation that China seeks to impose on Taiwan.
That the opposition leaders have automatically rejected this offer as a reflex action is disappointing.
We call on the opposition leaders to accept Chen's offer, and put down, even temporarily, their inter-party feuds to work together for Taiwan's interests overseas.
By next month, Ma will have officially taken up his post as KMT chairman, so if he were to accept Chen's offer to visit Central America, this would certainly help establish a new basis of cooperation between the DPP and KMT, and mark a clean break from outgoing KMT Chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) policy of resisting Chen at every opportunity, which has already done so much harm to the country.
Ma's acceptance would offer a ray of hope that Taiwan can achieve political harmony, and would also be an affirmation of Taiwan's determination, encompassing both ruling and opposition parties, to resist China.
Taking a neutral view of the issue based on a will to promote national interests, it would be difficult for opposition leaders to refuse Chen's invitation.
In March this year, China passed the "Anti-Secession" Law which allows its military to use "non-peaceful means" to deal with Taiwan if it does not give in to China's ambition to annex it. Despite the savagery inherent in such a law, the pan-blue leaders refused to participate in demonstrations against it.
Instead, they accepted invitations from Chinese President Hu Jintao (
We cannot help but wonder on what grounds pan-blue leaders -- who are readily prepared to settle their differences with the formerly hated Chinese Communist Party (CCP) -- can refuse to temporarily set aside their differences with the popularly elected Chen and join him in promoting Taiwan's foreign policy.
Intense opposition and diverging opinions exist in all democratic countries, but when it comes to national defense, foreign policy and other matters involving other states, there should be unity and everyone should work with the national interest in mind.
In particular, Ma, who calls himself a reformer, should move forward, away from past intense opposition between the blue and green camps and instead listen directly to grassroots opinion.
Five years after the power transition, the intense inter-party struggle that centers around the dislike between Lien and Soong on the one hand and Chen on the other is once again coming to the fore.
The public is heartily sick of this. But Soong's influence is waning and Lien is about to retire and pass the baton to Ma. If Ma is willing to accept Chen's invitation, there is a real chance that we could see an end to inter-party hatred, resolve the political deadlock and put an end to the public's nightmare.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Ian Bartholomew
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS