On Friday, the Japanese Diet passed a bill granting visitors from Taiwan visa-free treatment for their entries into Japan. The move is of course welcomed by the Taiwanese government and the public, since most countries do not formally recognize Taiwan and therefore do not grant such treatment to Taiwanese visitors, causing a lot of inconvenience for those who wish to travel abroad.
Even more noteworthy in these events was the fact that the bill was enacted against the backdrop of strong protests from Beijing, which, coupled with several other recent developments between Japan, Taiwan and China, suggests a gradual shift in the triangular relationship.
Taiwanese know full well how inconvenient it can be to travel abroad with a "Republic of China" Taiwanese passport. The granting of visa-free status to the citizens of a country is usually done through the signing of bilateral treaties or accords. But most countries do not formally recognize Taiwan, and therefore cannot enter into such agreements or accords with Taipei. This means locals typically need to get tourist visas issued by the government of the country which they intend to visit beforehand. However, this can be an extremely inconvenient and time-consuming process.
Despite the lack of a formal diplomatic relationship with Taiwan, the Japanese government managed to overcome the legal and technical challenge by granting the status through the passage of a domestic law. This reflects a high degree of friendship on the part of Japan toward Taiwan.
Making this move on the part of Japan even more prominent is the fact that such treatment continues to be denied to visitors from China, despite repeated requests from Beijing. In fact, as Japan was preparing to grant visa-free status to Taiwanese travelers, Beijing protested against the discrepancy in treatment between visitors from Taiwan and the "Chinese mainland," calling for the extension of the treatment to all "Chinese" visitors.
Understandably, from the standpoint of the Japanese government, there are many reasons to not grant such status to Chinese visitors -- the biggest one being the existing problem withillegal Chinese immigrants.
Japan is not the only country in the world which has a problem with Chinese students and visitors working and living in their host countries once their visa has expired. The US, Canada and even Taiwan have their hands full in this regard. It seems some people don't want to go back to the social paradise the Chinese Communist Party has created.
On the other hand, of all foreign tourists in Japan, Taiwanese rank No. 2 in terms of number, trailing only South Koreans. So, it is anticipated that the granting of visa-free status will further boost the number of Taiwanese tourists to Japan. Moreover, Taiwanese are well known for their willingness to spend big bucks on shopping and dining while abroad. The passage of the bill will therefore generate a lot of business opportunities and revenue for Japan as the host country.
This is not the first time that the Japanese government has been willing to deal with issues involving Taiwan against a backdrop of vocal protests from Beijing, and excluding Chinese participation during the entire process. A similar pattern was observed during the last round of negotiations between Taiwan and Japan over fishing rights -- in which requests for participation by Beijing were simply ignored.
These developments may be subtle, but are noteworthy. As China's rise as a regional threat continues, Japanese policy toward Beijing seems to have taken on a subtle and gradual shift. One can only hope this will lead to further, more significant changes in the future.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS