US President George W. Bush's controversial appointment of John Bolton, a reputedly abrasive Republican hawk, as US ambassador to the UN sits uneasily alongside the mission statement proclaimed only last week by Karen Hughes, America's new image maker-in-chief.
"There is no more important challenge for our future than the urgent need to foster greater understanding, more respect, and a sense of common interests and ideals among Americans and people of different countries, cultures and faiths," Hughes told the Senate.
She admitted her job as under-secretary of state for public diplomacy would be difficult. But she said the US' aim was to reach out to other countries rather than confront them.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
"The mission of public diplomacy is to engage, inform and help others understand our policies. I am mindful that before we seek to be understood, we must first work to understand ... But I am confident our ideals will prevail," she said.
Unlike Bolton, Hughes' nomination was unanimously approved. But it likewise surprised some in Washington. She is a White House insider with scant foreign experience. At a time of unprecedented anti-American feeling, her task would daunt the most seasoned diplomat. But she has two advantages over her predecessors.
Improving overseas perceptions of the US and its policies has become a top second-term priority for the administration. And Hughes has a degree of influence and access to Bush to make even her boss, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, envious.
Hughes worked as Bush's press secretary when he ran for the Texas governorship in 1994. By all accounts, the two developed a fierce mutual loyalty.
As a White House counsellor from 2001, she was variously described as Bush's consigliere, minder and "human firewall". Her forthright manner also earned her the nickname of Nurse Ratched after the bossy supervisor of a mental ward in the 1975 film, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.
The Washington Post columnist Anne Applebaum noted caustically that the US' biggest public relations challenge was not especially amenable to alliterative soundbites about "engagement, education and empowerment."
"What we call the `war on terror' is in fact a small part of a larger intellectual and religious struggle within Islam," she said.
"Friendly state visits by Laura Bush will not suffice ... Neither will more Britney Spears songs for Muslim teenagers on US-funded Farsi and Arabic radio," she said.
Hughes certainly needs some new post-Iraq tunes, as this year's Pew Global attitudes survey of 16 countries suggested.
"The United States remains broadly disliked in most countries surveyed, and the opinion of the American people is not as positive as it once was," Pew found. "The magnitude of America's image problem is such that even popular US policies [such as tsunami relief] have done little to repair it. Attitudes toward the US remain quite negative in the Muslim world, though hostility towards America has eased."
Yet, contrary to what the Bolton affair suggests, there is more to Hughes' appointment than touching up the paintwork on the Bush bandwagon. The US knows it has a problem -- and is moving tentatively to tackle it.
The administration's decision to drop the phrase "global war on terror" in favor of "global struggle against violent extremism" appears part of a wider effort to de-emphasize military solutions and to recruit European allies to help attract moderate Muslim opinion.
Rice's "practical idealism" in foreign policy is said to be gaining ground over the neo-conservative ideologues of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon. The refashioned White House emphasis is on promoting democracy, about which most can agree, rather than unilaterally bashing "rogue regimes."
The bottom line is whether Bush accepts that policies as well as presentation will have to change if the US' image is to be rehabilitated.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS