US President George W. Bush's controversial appointment of John Bolton, a reputedly abrasive Republican hawk, as US ambassador to the UN sits uneasily alongside the mission statement proclaimed only last week by Karen Hughes, America's new image maker-in-chief.
"There is no more important challenge for our future than the urgent need to foster greater understanding, more respect, and a sense of common interests and ideals among Americans and people of different countries, cultures and faiths," Hughes told the Senate.
She admitted her job as under-secretary of state for public diplomacy would be difficult. But she said the US' aim was to reach out to other countries rather than confront them.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
"The mission of public diplomacy is to engage, inform and help others understand our policies. I am mindful that before we seek to be understood, we must first work to understand ... But I am confident our ideals will prevail," she said.
Unlike Bolton, Hughes' nomination was unanimously approved. But it likewise surprised some in Washington. She is a White House insider with scant foreign experience. At a time of unprecedented anti-American feeling, her task would daunt the most seasoned diplomat. But she has two advantages over her predecessors.
Improving overseas perceptions of the US and its policies has become a top second-term priority for the administration. And Hughes has a degree of influence and access to Bush to make even her boss, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, envious.
Hughes worked as Bush's press secretary when he ran for the Texas governorship in 1994. By all accounts, the two developed a fierce mutual loyalty.
As a White House counsellor from 2001, she was variously described as Bush's consigliere, minder and "human firewall". Her forthright manner also earned her the nickname of Nurse Ratched after the bossy supervisor of a mental ward in the 1975 film, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.
The Washington Post columnist Anne Applebaum noted caustically that the US' biggest public relations challenge was not especially amenable to alliterative soundbites about "engagement, education and empowerment."
"What we call the `war on terror' is in fact a small part of a larger intellectual and religious struggle within Islam," she said.
"Friendly state visits by Laura Bush will not suffice ... Neither will more Britney Spears songs for Muslim teenagers on US-funded Farsi and Arabic radio," she said.
Hughes certainly needs some new post-Iraq tunes, as this year's Pew Global attitudes survey of 16 countries suggested.
"The United States remains broadly disliked in most countries surveyed, and the opinion of the American people is not as positive as it once was," Pew found. "The magnitude of America's image problem is such that even popular US policies [such as tsunami relief] have done little to repair it. Attitudes toward the US remain quite negative in the Muslim world, though hostility towards America has eased."
Yet, contrary to what the Bolton affair suggests, there is more to Hughes' appointment than touching up the paintwork on the Bush bandwagon. The US knows it has a problem -- and is moving tentatively to tackle it.
The administration's decision to drop the phrase "global war on terror" in favor of "global struggle against violent extremism" appears part of a wider effort to de-emphasize military solutions and to recruit European allies to help attract moderate Muslim opinion.
Rice's "practical idealism" in foreign policy is said to be gaining ground over the neo-conservative ideologues of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon. The refashioned White House emphasis is on promoting democracy, about which most can agree, rather than unilaterally bashing "rogue regimes."
The bottom line is whether Bush accepts that policies as well as presentation will have to change if the US' image is to be rehabilitated.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS