Taiwan's skill at fundraising is outstanding among Asia-Pacific nations, and at various international conferences this ability has often earned the admiration of delegates.
But, underlying this enormous ability to mobilize resources is a relatively immature legal environment. Most politicians and the public in Taiwan have a narrow definition of philanthropy, which is equated with charity. People lack the concept of philanthropic investment.
This situation is aggravated by the media, who have focused on the bickering surrounding the issue, and have not exercised effective supervision or contributed to social progress in this regard.
The US provides some good example of leadership in public welfare. The director of the US Girl Scouts was a former navy admiral. Elizabeth Dole, wife of Senator Bob Dole was a former president of the American Red Cross. Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao has served as Peace Corps director, deputy secretary of the Department of Transportation and chief executive officer (CEO) of the United Way of America -- which she helped recover from a major scandal in 1993.
A charity report published by the US-based Better Business Bureau's Wise Giving Alliance (www.give.org) revealed that the annual compensation for the CEO of the United Way of America is US$500,000, the president of World Vision is US$360,000, the president of the World Wildlife Fund is US$280,000, and the CEO of the American Cancer Society is US$760,000. Are these amounts excessive? As opposed to the tens of millions earned by CEOs in business, such remuneration seems reasonable for leaders of major national organizations.
This report informs people about the size, services, scope and use of funds, so that they can make their own decision before making a donation.
Full-time CEOs of public welfare groups in Taiwan have usually worked their way up within the organization. Few of them have transferred from business. An exception is World Vision Taiwan director Hank Du (
There are very few concerned and talented people who have taken up senior positions in welfare organizations after serving an important role in government. One such person is former Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) minister Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), who was invited to take over as secretary-general of the Red Cross.
Such an arrangement is commonly seen in other countries. In fact, from several post-disaster recovery experiences, Hau has brought his skills acquired from the government fully into play and showed his charisma and daring in coordinating all relevant bodies.
With the support of the Earthquake Post-Disaster Recovery Commission, he effectively communicated with the central government, business, charity organizations and disaster areas, allowing the Sungho Village to migrate to its current location after the July 2 flooding last year and complete reconstruction before the rainy season this year.
Given Hou's talents and his knowledge and ability to effectively manage a huge organization, the aforementioned amount of annual compensation can even be regarded as disproportionately small. Where does the media accusation that such people are squandering donors' contributions come from?
A mature society requires the same standard of leadership talent in government, business and non-profit organizations to have a positive impact on society.
I once participated in a symposium about interdisciplinary leadership. The discussion was aimed at leadership styles in politics, business and philanthropy. The keynote speakers were well-known figures, but the public welfare-related discussion could only call upon a mid-level bureaucrat, a clear indication that for most people, involvement in charity events is just an additional way of increasing their exposure. Very few are truly dedicated to philanthropic tasks.
If this reflects the value that Taiwanese society puts on volunteer sector participation, then it is worrisome as to where to find our future non-profit organization professionals.
When Hilary Clinton was the first lady of the US, she initiated a campaign for children with the slogan "it takes a village." This slogan can be adapted to Taiwan's needs.
We need politicians to take the development of public welfare groups seriously and examine and supervise legislation related to public welfare-related fund-raising which have languished in the legislature.
The premier, in particular, must conduct discussions regarding non-profit organization development on the policy level. He should not make lower-ranking officials bear the responsibility, for otherwise these matters will never get on the legislative agenda, let alone becoming policy.
It is also necessary for the media to supervise the efficiency and honesty of charity groups, keeping track of how they deal with their funds. In this way, the public can exercise their compassion and invest in this society. And in this way, by giving human services professionals the dignity they deserve, will more young people be attracted to this field.
Chen Wen-liang is deputy secretary-general of the United Way of Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS