Eleven years after its initial connection to the World Wide Web, China's access to the Internet is still guarded by firewalls, embedded in its proxy servers, which have proven to be more practical and impenetrable than the Berlin Wall. Moreover, an increase in the demand for broadband connections has triggered the launch of a US$800 million "Golden Shield Project," an automatic digital system of public policing that will help prolong Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rule by denying China's people the right to information.
The principle underlying the Golden Shield is that "as virtue rises one foot, vice rises ten." Aided by systems developed by Western intelligence agencies, China has forged a virtual sword that threatens to block the path to democracy.
Internet "gateways" mainly supervise and filter political information in China. Their technical functions include blocking overseas Web sites, filtering content and key words on Web pages, monitoring email and Internet cafes, hijacking PC's, sending out viruses, and inter-connecting with the monitoring systems of the Public Security Bureaus.
Rather than heralding a new era of freedom, the Internet is enabling Chinese authorities to perfect totalitarian control in a way that puts the rulers in George Orwell's 1984 to shame.
Since April 15, the Golden Shield's advanced science and technology has been monitoring every thought and action of those Chinese people who use the Internet. But what Orwell failed to predict is that China's government has accomplished this with the help of Western democracies.
Today, China is the only country in the world that has enshrined in law the concept of a "Web political criminal." Publishing articles on the Internet can amount to "committing an offense," and "radical views" may result in imprisonment. The real criminals, the officers of the companies -- Nortel, Cisco and Sun Microsystems -- that built this sinister system of mind control, will never get closer to a prison than China's five-star hotels.
From 2000, when the first Chinese "Web criminal" Lin Haiyin was imprisoned for instigating subversive actions, to the recent arrest of writer Shi Tao (
Internet communication in modern China is filled with baits and traps: user-friendly Web page designs, easy-to-click icons and symbolized facial expressions, beautiful female stars in online ads and constantly updated international news induce users to participate and express their own ideas. But once someone's fingertips touch the keyboard, the "Kitchen Table Democracy" of the Web no longer exists -- he or she may find themselves stepping into a trap, because the Internet Police monitor every word that is typed.
In a country where freedom of expression has been off-limits for half a century, the Internet was a godsend: people poured their enthusiasm into it by building Web sites and personal homepages. Now these people find themselves exposed to the Public Security Bureaus.
For example, the Democracy and Freedom Web site has been either temporarily shut down or blocked 43 times in three years. Its robust reports on the death of Zhao Ziyang (
Today, the average online lifespan of proxy servers in China is a mere 30 minutes, and 17,000 Internet cafes have been shut down. The online filtering technology is capable of blocking or intercepting the e-mails of the 80 million or so "Netizens" in China.
Because Internet chat rooms and personal e-mails have become essential to many Chinese, the upgrading of Internet supervision is also gaining momentum. As a result, thinkers today are far more likely to get caught expressing "unsanctioned" ideas than they ever were in the 1980s and early 1990s, when underground publications served as the main channel of free expression.
Indeed, although the Internet's coverage in China has been expanding steadily, the CCP's ability to censor it has grown even faster, thanks to Western technology. The party has been dreaming of this kind of oversight ever since its revolutionary days. Dictatorship is not only safe in China, it's on the offensive.
But not forever. Although the Golden Shield Project is the CCP's largest single investment in the ideological field since it gained control of China in 1949, it is also likely to be the last big bet before the party's collapse. Like the Berlin Wall, China's Internet restrictions may be technically sound, even as they defend the indefensible and sustain the unsustainable.
Ma Jian is the author of the acclaimed memoir Red Dust and of the novel The Noodlemaker, among other books. He now lives in exile.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS