Fueled by the surge in oil prices, a car revolution is sweeping US freeways with gas-guzzling mega-cars being forced off the road by smaller, cleaner hybrid automobiles.
Hollywood stars such as Brad Pitt and Cameron Diaz have made the dual electric- and gas-powered cars a chic item on Los Angeles boulevards. In the rest of the country, housewives who see their monthly bills rising are following the example.
Some buyers are waiting more than six months to get a new Toyota Prius, while waiting times for a luxury Lexus RX 400 hybrid can take up to a year.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Some people are paying more than the price of a brand new car to get one second-hand.
The US has long been the land of the Sports Utility Vehicle (SUV), the four-wheel-drive giants that have dominated US roads for decades.
Experts say the rising cost of gasoline is the main cause of a slump in SUV sales. But sales of the purring hybrids have been boosted by Hollywood filmstars.
"To my opinion, we are right before the explosion of sales," said Bradley Berman, the editor of www.hybridcars.com, a Web site devoted to hybrid vehicles such as the Prius and Honda Insight.
Berman says that although sales of hybrids nationally have not even reached 1 percent of total vehicle sales, they have still doubled annually over the past two years.
Some 10,000 hybrid vehicles were sold across the US in 2000, but sales are expected to rocket to 1.2 million units by 2008, according to research by Oak Ridge Labs.
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger proudly touts his gas-guzzling Hummer -- one of the biggest SUVs available -- but other public figures are turning against the big-is-beautiful status symbol.
Diaz, Pitt and fellow stars Leonardo DiCaprio, Kirk Douglas, Harrison Ford, Selma Hayek and Jack Nicholson have all joined the green revolution and added a hybrid to their auto stables.
Hummer sales plummeted 27.8 percent last month from a year ago, according to General Motors, while Ford Motor Co reported that sales of its Ford Explorer SUV fell 14.6 percent last month compared with April last year.
"What you're seeing is a response to the high gas prices. During the '70s you saw people switch to smaller cars. It's a direct response to the gas hikes," said David Stewart, a professor of marketing at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.
"More generally, Californians are more conscious of environmental issues and air quality. And Californians spend a lot more time in their automobiles," Stewart said.
However, the rising popularity of such fuel-efficient vehicles -- which are driven by more complex technology than normal cars -- appears to have caught some manufacturers off guard as they vie to keep up with consumer demand.
A key attraction of hybrids, with oil prices averaging around US$50 a barrel, is that they sip gas rather than guzzle it.
An average SUV will consume about 20 liters of gas over a 100km trip compared with a hybrid which requires just four to five liters of gas.
Another environmental benefit is that hybrids emit less pollution than purely gas-driven vehicles.
"I decided to buy one because I hated to stay in traffic jams with my engine running. It eased my mind," said Joe Mellis, 39, a Los Angeles real estate agent and hybrid enthusiast.
"The Prius doesn't eat gas when stalled. It's my second Prius since 2002. I bought the new model last year because it was larger," Mellis added.
Other proud owners believe such vehicles could help reduce US dependence on Middle East oil, and that with some hybrid models able to accelerate from zero to 96kph in 6.5 seconds, owners won't be left in the slow lane.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission