The official royal wedding tankards have gone on sale, the special postal stamps are ready for issue.
But the mugs fail to show the faces of the bride and groom. They portray instead two interlinked C's -- for Charles and Camilla.
The image is copied from a pair of gold cufflinks Camilla gave Charles more than 20 years ago -- and which he wore on his honeymoon with Princess Diana in 1981.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
The special stamps, many Britons have vowed, will be stuck on envelopes upside down in protest at the civil wedding on April 8.
There is something odd about the spring wedding of Prince Charles, 56-year-old heir to the British throne, to his mistress of 34 years, Camilla Parker Bowles.
The quiet acknowledgement, indifference, teasing and hostility that has greeted the decision by Prince Charles to marry 57-year-old Parker Bowles, has become a barometer of the relationship between the monarchy and its subjects.
"The whole affair illustrates the disjointed relationship between the monarchy and the public in the 21st century", one royal observer said.
The blunders and compromises required to circumvent the intricacies of etiquette, religion and procedure for a royal marriage between two divorcees have caused some to dismiss it as a soap opera.
"The royal family still has a special religious and constitutional position, but it also stars in a kind of low comedy played out in the media to general amusement or outrage," one BBC commentator said.
The British public, known for its sense of fairness, has in its majority, given the couple its blessing.
The lack of obvious enthusiasm is rooted, perhaps understandably, in deep-seated affection for the late Princess Diana and the role Prince Charles' affair with Camilla played in the breakdown of her marriage to Charles nine years ago.
Comparisons are inevitably made, and on that score, Charles and Camilla have a distinct advantage.
"Second marriages, even royal ones, are never the same," commented the Wall Street Journal. In this case, and as far as comparisons go, the ages and looks of the protagonists tend to count against them.
Perhaps the most pressing question on the mind of Britons is what Charles sees in Camilla, and why he decided to take the plunge now.
For the timing there is no simple answer -- except, since the announcement was made on Feb. 10, Charles has appeared a greatly relieved and happier man.
Ever since Charles met Camilla Shand at a polo match at Windsor in 1970, the two have conducted a passionate affair.
They married other partners, enduring the ignominy of scandal and the humiliation of a clandestine relationship.
And yet, relations between the two families were always close.
Soon after Andrew Parker Bowles, a dashing courtier and commander of the Household Cavalry, married Camilla in 1973, he remarked about Charles: "His Royal Highness seems awfully fond of my wife."
A year later, Prince Charles was made the godfather of the Parker Bowles' first child, Tom. Now 30, Tom will be a witness at his mother's wedding to the prince.
Royal observers believe that Charles, perceived by many as weak, over-sensitive and eccentric, received from Camilla the love and affirmation of his personality that his parents, and the young Diana, had failed to convey.
"I do love you, I'm so proud of you," Camilla revealed on the infamous "Camillagate tapes" that also offered a glimpse of the couple's intimate sexual relationship.
"Your greatest achievement is to love me," replied Charles in the conversation that allegedly took place in December, 1989. The tapes were published in 1993.
In the seven-and-half years since the tragic death of Princess Diana in Paris, Camilla's influence over Charles has steadily, and quietly, grown.
Insiders report that Camilla, since she moved into her own apartment in Charles' London palace, Clarence House, two years ago, has increasingly become the power behind the throne.
Gradually, her looks and appearance, said by her most scathing critics to be resembling the "back end of a Bedford bus," are improving.
Like Diana before her, Camilla now has a range of her favorite designers at her beck and call.
The most intriguing question remains how the wedlock between Charles and Camilla will affect, in the longer term, the British monarchy, at home and in the 53 Commonwealth countries.
The British public have stated, in their overwhelming majority, that they do not wish Camilla to be called queen.
Taking account of these sensitivities, she will be known as "Princess Consort" when Charles accedes to the throne.
In reality, however, she will be "queen in all but name," as one leading politician put it.
For the time being, the nation is quietly hoping that Queen Elizabeth II, now 78 and in rude good health, will be at the helm long enough to keep the monarchy on a steady course.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS