Within hours of a massive 8.7 magnitude earthquake off the coast of Indonesia late on Monday night, tens of thousands of coastal denizens along the Indian Ocean were fleeing their homes and hotels in fear of another killer tsunami.
Thankfully, none came, but had Monday's quake triggered a tidal wave similar to the Dec. 26 disaster, this time round Asia would definitely have been better prepared.
The Dec. 26 tsunamis killed approximately 275,000 people in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India and Thailand.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Many of the victims were taken by complete surprise, given the rarity of tsunamis in the Indian Ocean and the lack of any early warning system similar to the one in the much more tsunami-prone Pacific Ocean.
Three months after the disaster, Asia still lacks a proper tsunami early warning system but fresh memories, fear and localized systems seem to be working adequately.
"The early warning system is not set up yet, so right now the system is not working," said Budi Waluyo, National Meteorology and Geophysics Office in Jakarta.
"Right now the only early warning system we have is what happened last night in Medan and other cities where the local police officers just gave some public announcements," Waluyo said.
For many in tsunami-traumatized Aceh, the quake itself was the early warning system. By the time the news was even broadcast on radios and televisions here, residents in areas that would have been affected by a tsunami were already well on the move.
The quake was felt as far away as southern Thailand, where tourists were evacuated from hotels in Hat Yai and Phuket, for fear of after-shocks and tsunamis.
Thailand's Meteorological Department issued tsunami warnings on television and radio to residents and tourists in the six provinces rimming the Andaman Sea about 30 minutes after the Indonesian quake.
Not everyone was satisfied with the government's warnings. For instance, hoteliers in Phuket's Patong beach resort, hard hit by the Dec. 26 disaster, complained that police did not get around to urging an evacuation until two hours after the Indonesian quake.
"I was not 100 percent satisfied with our performance," admitted Smith Dharmasaroja, the official attached to the prime minister's office who is in charge of setting up Thailand's first National Disaster Center.
"We had some difficulties sending messages to television and radio stations," Smith said. "When our National Disaster Center is complete next month the system will work better."
Thailand was criticized for failing to issue tsunami warnings after the Dec. 26 quake, and may even face lawsuits from relatives of the victims for failing to prevent unnecessary deaths.
In India, the first warning came from meteorologists in the government's ministry of science and technology, who alerted the home ministry within an hour of the earthquake hitting Indonesia.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh convened an emergency meeting and the home ministry set up an emergency control room. The Indian navy, army and air force were put on high alert.
Two hours after the earthquake, an official federal government tsunami alert was issued to eastern coastal states and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands in the Indian Ocean. Last December, the killer tidal waves crashed into eastern coastal India in about three hours after the earthquake.
Last December it took the government's Crisis Management Group six hours after the earthquake to hold its first meeting and decide on a strategy. Though the government has withdrawn the warning, some residents were reluctant to return for fear that the tsunami threat was not yet over.
The science ministry got quick inputs from tidal gauges installed in the Andamans, the archipelago that almost stretches to the tip of Sumatra. By midnight officials confirmed that a tsunami was unlikely, but coastal areas kept a vigil through the night.
In Sri Lanka, the government made public appeals at midnight on Monday for civilians to withdraw 2km from the coastal line. Police used loud speakers to warn people on land, while fishermen at sea were alerted by radio.
Myanmar, which lost less than 100 people to the Dec. 26 tsunami, first issued warnings to its southernmost coastal areas about 5 hours after the Indonesian quake.
The warnings, primarily to Rakhine State, were done chiefly by telephone since there are no television and radio broadcasts by the state-controlled media earlier than 7am.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then