Since the 19th century, the strategic framework of the Asia-Pacific region has long displayed a competitive situation between maritime and continental powers.
In the post-Cold War era, the disintegration of the Soviet Union allowed China to replace it as the predominant naval power in Asia. Following the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the strategic cooperation among the US, Japan and China has gradually become a strategic competition. This change is a manifestation of the Asia-Pacific strategic situation's return to confrontation between maritime and continental powers.
Taiwan is situated between the Pacific Ocean and the Asian continent, and also Northeast and Southeast Asia. This is also the meeting point of the Asia-Pacific and the Eurasian continental powers. Taiwan's historical experience -- including several regime changes and its current restraint by the international community -- ? is a reflection of the international strategic framework that surrounds cross-strait issues.
Since none of the concerned parties are unwilling to forsake Taiwan, Taiwanese people's freedom of action is bound to be restricted, but this is also an indication that the Taiwan issue is a crucial factor in driving efforts toward achieving a strategic balance in the Asia-Pacific.
In strategic interactions between the US and Japan, the US-Japan alliance represents the force of Asia-Pacific sea power. At the beginning of the post-Cold War era, the alliance experienced a period of drift, but as China's challenge to the current Asia-Pacific situation became evident after superseding the former Soviet Union as the region's main continental power, the goals of the US-Japan alliance have become more defined.
The alliance has evolved from a security pact focused on defending Japan to taking a managing role in the Asia-Pacific region.
The US-Japan Joint Declaration on Security made last month listed cross-strait peace as an issue of joint concern. This shows that the US-Japan alliance has broadened its vision to include the whole region, or the whole world. This implies that with the mighty force of maritime power, the alliance wants to shape the Asia-Pacific strategic order to the benefit of maritime democracies.
Another crucial factor in influencing the strategic framework for the Asia-Pacific region is China. Anti-Russian, China was seen as an ally by the US-Japan alliance during the Cold World era. However, when the Cold War ended, China instead began to view the alliance as an enemy.
Beijing's move to inaugurate the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in Shanghai and develop cooperative ties with Pakistan, Myanmar and Russia clearly showed that it was attempting to counterbalance the maritime powers in the Asia-Pacific region by consolidating its ties with continental powers in Asia.
Therefore, the confrontational situation between maritime and continental powers that existed in Asia during the Cold War continues to exist.The maritime forces -- represented by the US-Japan alliance -- ?and continental forces -- represented by China -- ? congregate and confront one another in the Taiwan Strait. Although we are faced with a rising China, this has also made Taiwan a player in the setting of the political agenda on cross-strait issues. This is mainly because of the progress it has made in democratization.
The democratization in Taiwan has not only linked the country to post-Cold War global mainstream values, but has also allowed Taiwanese public opinion and social forces to become an integral part of developing diplomatic ties with other nations. This has not only made the international foreign policy elite fail to restrict the future of Taiwan by keeping the nation's leadership in check, but also the policies they designed for Taiwan will be directly reviewed by the Taiwanese.
Beijing's enactment of the "Anti-Secession" Law shows that its leadership fears Taiwan's democratic progress and wants to restrict it. Beijing also wants to restrain the US-Japan alliance's role in the region, especially from defining the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.
Since the new law directly involves the confrontation between maritime forces and continental forces as well Taiwan's democratic development, it impacts the strategic framework in the Asia-Pacific and on the sustainability of democratic development in the region. That is why the US, Japan and Taiwan have reacted fiercely to the matter.
The law has revealed to the Chinese people the nature of the Communist regime of Chinese President Hu Jintao (
It also shows that China has no intention of co-existing peacefully with Taiwan and rather sees the Taiwan question as a remnant of the civil war.
The Hu-Wen leadership is more like a Chinese version of Russian President Vladimir Putin's leadership instead of a regime that spread new ideas and ended East-West tensions during the era of former Russian president Mikhail Gorbachev.
Taiwan's reaction to the law is going to become a crucial factor in deciding whether or not the law is going to be effective. If the Taiwanese are united and take concrete measures to demonstrate their undaunted courage against China's military coercion, not only does it mean we have passed a significant test for democratic progress in our society but also we have constructed new civic unity.
This will also establish a foothold for international pro-democracy forces in the region. If we keep trying to blame each other or limit ourselves and beg for mercy in order not to anger China, the international community will be unable to come to our aid and the Red Terror will eventually reduce Taiwan to silence. If Taiwan is deprived of its democracy, its future will be even more tragic than Hong Kong's.
Lin Chia-lung is the former director-general of the Government Information Office.
Translated by Daniel Cheng and Lin Ya-ti
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS