April 4 marks the 15th anniversary of the promulgation of Hong Kong's Constitution, the Basic Law, by China's National People's Congress. The Basic Law supposedly established a political framework to accord with the late Deng Xiaoping's (鄧小平) policy of "one country, two systems," with Hong Kong's people ruling Hong Kong with a high degree of autonomy.
Under this policy, Hong Kong's capitalist system, the rule of law, and its people's freedoms and way of life were to be preserved. It provided for a popularly elected chief executive and Legislative Council. Apart from defense and foreign affairs, Hong Kong was to be master of its own house.
But, despite its promise of universal suffrage, the Basic Law restricts democratic development during the first 10 years after the handover of Hong Kong. Full democracy is to be permitted only in 2007.
I said in my maiden speech in the Legislative Council in 1985 that the policy of "one country, two systems" cannot work without democracy. As Deng once said of China: "With a good system, even evil men cannot do evil. But without a good system, even good men cannot do good, but may be forced to do evil."
For Hong Kong, the only good system is democracy. For under a democracy, those in power realize that it is the people who put them in office, and they will be voted out if they are perceived to be serving China's interests.
Of course, Deng's policy can work only if Beijing wants it to work. Indeed, not only must China refrain from interfering in Hong Kong's internal affairs, but it must encourage the people of Hong Kong to defend their much smaller system.
Unfortunately, Beijing has other ideas. On July 1, 2003, the sixth anniversary of the handover, nearly a million people took to Hong Kong's streets in a peaceful protest against an anti-subversion bill that would have eroded freedom of the press, of religion and of association. The demonstration led the bill's withdrawal, as well as to the resignation of the secretary for security, who was responsible for it.
The demonstration spurred a major change in China's policy toward Hong Kong. Until then, interference from China was covert and subtle, so that the public perception was that chief executive Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) was in charge. Afterwards, China adopted a hands-on approach, letting the people know who the boss really is. Thus, on April 26 last year, China announced its unilateral decision that Hong Kong is not to have democracy in 2007 without saying when Hong Kong will have it.
Then came Tung's resignation early this month. The popular belief is that Tung was sacked or pressured to step down. Although the election of the next chief executive will not take place until July, China has let it be known that acting chief executive Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) is the chosen one.
Moreover, although the Basic Law prescribes a five-year term for the chief executive, China is insisting that the winner will only serve for the remainder of Tung's term, until June 30, 2007. The clear message is that after almost eight years of Chinese rule Beijing does not trust anyone in Hong Kong to govern for five years.
This, surely, is the greatest indictment of China's Hong Kong policy since 1997. But the solution lies in changing the system, not just the leader. The way forward is not more control or suppression, but more trust and democracy. The latter leads to the full implementation of Deng's "one country, two systems" policy, while the former turns the Basic Law into a worthless piece of paper.
In 1984, then British prime minister Margaret Thatcher said of the impending handover of Hong Kong, "The eyes of the world are on us." That may or may not be true today, but at least the people of Taiwan are watching.
Martin Lee is the founding chairman of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
RSS