April 4 marks the 15th anniversary of the promulgation of Hong Kong's Constitution, the Basic Law, by China's National People's Congress. The Basic Law supposedly established a political framework to accord with the late Deng Xiaoping's (鄧小平) policy of "one country, two systems," with Hong Kong's people ruling Hong Kong with a high degree of autonomy.
Under this policy, Hong Kong's capitalist system, the rule of law, and its people's freedoms and way of life were to be preserved. It provided for a popularly elected chief executive and Legislative Council. Apart from defense and foreign affairs, Hong Kong was to be master of its own house.
But, despite its promise of universal suffrage, the Basic Law restricts democratic development during the first 10 years after the handover of Hong Kong. Full democracy is to be permitted only in 2007.
I said in my maiden speech in the Legislative Council in 1985 that the policy of "one country, two systems" cannot work without democracy. As Deng once said of China: "With a good system, even evil men cannot do evil. But without a good system, even good men cannot do good, but may be forced to do evil."
For Hong Kong, the only good system is democracy. For under a democracy, those in power realize that it is the people who put them in office, and they will be voted out if they are perceived to be serving China's interests.
Of course, Deng's policy can work only if Beijing wants it to work. Indeed, not only must China refrain from interfering in Hong Kong's internal affairs, but it must encourage the people of Hong Kong to defend their much smaller system.
Unfortunately, Beijing has other ideas. On July 1, 2003, the sixth anniversary of the handover, nearly a million people took to Hong Kong's streets in a peaceful protest against an anti-subversion bill that would have eroded freedom of the press, of religion and of association. The demonstration led the bill's withdrawal, as well as to the resignation of the secretary for security, who was responsible for it.
The demonstration spurred a major change in China's policy toward Hong Kong. Until then, interference from China was covert and subtle, so that the public perception was that chief executive Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) was in charge. Afterwards, China adopted a hands-on approach, letting the people know who the boss really is. Thus, on April 26 last year, China announced its unilateral decision that Hong Kong is not to have democracy in 2007 without saying when Hong Kong will have it.
Then came Tung's resignation early this month. The popular belief is that Tung was sacked or pressured to step down. Although the election of the next chief executive will not take place until July, China has let it be known that acting chief executive Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) is the chosen one.
Moreover, although the Basic Law prescribes a five-year term for the chief executive, China is insisting that the winner will only serve for the remainder of Tung's term, until June 30, 2007. The clear message is that after almost eight years of Chinese rule Beijing does not trust anyone in Hong Kong to govern for five years.
This, surely, is the greatest indictment of China's Hong Kong policy since 1997. But the solution lies in changing the system, not just the leader. The way forward is not more control or suppression, but more trust and democracy. The latter leads to the full implementation of Deng's "one country, two systems" policy, while the former turns the Basic Law into a worthless piece of paper.
In 1984, then British prime minister Margaret Thatcher said of the impending handover of Hong Kong, "The eyes of the world are on us." That may or may not be true today, but at least the people of Taiwan are watching.
Martin Lee is the founding chairman of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS