On Monday, Chiang Pin-kun (
After arriving in Guangzhou, Chiang told reporters that the primary purpose of the trip was to discuss direct links and passenger and freight services across the Taiwan Strait. He said that the results of these discussions would be passed on to the government for implementation. Another object for this delegation is to pave the way for KMT Chairman Lien Chan's (
The arrangements for Lien's visit to China is an internal matter for the KMT. However, the delegation arrived in China two days after hundreds of thousands of Taiwanese took to the streets of Taipei to protest Beijing's passage of the "Anti-Secession" Law. Therefore, the timing of the KMT's visit to China seems calculated to soothe China's embarrassment over the rally and to misdirect world opinion into believing that the people of Taiwan do not object to the law's passage. The visit has therefore drawn criticism from pan-green legislators and civic groups.
It seems that the KMT deliberately timed its visit to China for this most inappropriate time and that it has ambitions of playing the peacekeeper. Perhaps it believes that walking a political tightrope is the best way to break the deadlock in cross-strait relations. But this risky strategy could just as easily destroy the KMT altogether if it fails.
Chiang told the media that "if there is anything that the government is unwilling to do or cannot do, let the KMT, the largest opposition party in Taiwan, take over and complete the mission." Clearly, the KMT has ambitions of taking over the government's role in cross-strait relations by playing a more active part. Whether the KMT can win over the general public with its ambitions will be seen in future elections.
Beijing seeks to use the opposition to disrupt the government. Such tactics are hardly surprising. Having been defeated in two consecutive national elections, the KMT is now actively seeking to improve its relations with China. Are they really so naive that they will willingly walk into a trap laid for them by Beijing, accepting the task of helping to disrupt Taiwan's political environment? This is something that those KMT members who claim to love Taiwan should be wary of.
If we look at the results of the two previous peace talks between the Nationalists and the Communists, we can see that on both occasions the Nationalists emerged as losers, which is why Chiang Kai-shek (
But if this is the path that the KMT has chosen, then they should at least take the opportunity during this visit to make Beijing understand Taiwan's opposition to the "Anti-Secession" Law. At all costs they must avoid pandering to Beijing's views, forgetting their own position as a result. Otherwise, the KMT will already have lost its self-confidence and dignity before the peace talks can even get off the ground, and they will be despised by China for allowing that to happen.
Former KMT chairman and president Lee Teng-hui (
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS