So, Taiwan won the first round by successfully telling the world that democracy and peace should prevail over China's belligerent move to enact the "Anti-Secession Law." With a rational but steadfast demonstration of public will, the March 26 parade sent a clear message to the Beijing leadership that only the people of Taiwan can decide their own future.
After the parade, the month-long battle between Taiwan and China over Beijing's legislation has entered into the next stage -- an even more decisive struggle about how to forge an institutionalized and peace-oriented cross-strait interaction.
An authoritarian China might ignore international pressure -- including warnings from the US and Japan -- to take necessary steps to ease the tension created by its passage of the law. However, pressure would also be applied on Taiwan's government both domestically and externally.
After skillfully finding a balance between the necessity for the Taiwanese people to react strongly to Beijing's action and the need to show self-restraint in order to avoid making matters worse, the Chen Shui-bian (
What tops Chen's agenda next is how to bridge the diverse reactions to the government's cross-strait policy. The fundamentalists, led by former president Lee Teng-hui (
The opposition pan-blue camp, after boycotting the March 26 rally, started its own kowtow trip to China on Monday, led by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Chang Ping-kun (
The cross-strait stalemate will also bring new challenges to the recent attempts initiated by Chen to pursue reconciliation with People First Party Chairman James Soong (
On the international front, the short-term sympathy for Taiwan will not last long, and Taiwan should avoid complacency regarding its campaign against the Anti-Secession Law.
Chen must redouble his efforts to conduct intensive and frank communication with the US and other major countries to reiterate Taiwan's stance of "reconciliation without flinching, standing firm yet avoiding confrontation." Moreover, maintaining candid and frequent communication will help Taiwan's government learn what is on the minds of the leaders of the People's Republic of China (PRC).
Washington's role remains significant and crucial to Taiwan's next steps. Various reports have hinted that the US administration of President George W. Bush might talk Beijing into accepting Taipei's bid for observer status in the World Health Assembly. In that case, Taiwan should carefully consider whether to accept whatever Washington offers.
Washington's next step also must be to determine the "red lines" of the PRC authorities and define the "three conditions" under which Beijing would use "non-peaceful means" to try to take over Taiwan.
The next few months will be the real test for cross-strait relations. Taiwan's strategy of "self-restraint" changed its image and put the ball in China's court. Nevertheless, how Taiwan adjusts its cross-strait policy while making the best use of international leverage will determine the final victory in this tough battle.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS