So, Taiwan won the first round by successfully telling the world that democracy and peace should prevail over China's belligerent move to enact the "Anti-Secession Law." With a rational but steadfast demonstration of public will, the March 26 parade sent a clear message to the Beijing leadership that only the people of Taiwan can decide their own future.
After the parade, the month-long battle between Taiwan and China over Beijing's legislation has entered into the next stage -- an even more decisive struggle about how to forge an institutionalized and peace-oriented cross-strait interaction.
An authoritarian China might ignore international pressure -- including warnings from the US and Japan -- to take necessary steps to ease the tension created by its passage of the law. However, pressure would also be applied on Taiwan's government both domestically and externally.
After skillfully finding a balance between the necessity for the Taiwanese people to react strongly to Beijing's action and the need to show self-restraint in order to avoid making matters worse, the Chen Shui-bian (
What tops Chen's agenda next is how to bridge the diverse reactions to the government's cross-strait policy. The fundamentalists, led by former president Lee Teng-hui (
The opposition pan-blue camp, after boycotting the March 26 rally, started its own kowtow trip to China on Monday, led by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Chang Ping-kun (
The cross-strait stalemate will also bring new challenges to the recent attempts initiated by Chen to pursue reconciliation with People First Party Chairman James Soong (
On the international front, the short-term sympathy for Taiwan will not last long, and Taiwan should avoid complacency regarding its campaign against the Anti-Secession Law.
Chen must redouble his efforts to conduct intensive and frank communication with the US and other major countries to reiterate Taiwan's stance of "reconciliation without flinching, standing firm yet avoiding confrontation." Moreover, maintaining candid and frequent communication will help Taiwan's government learn what is on the minds of the leaders of the People's Republic of China (PRC).
Washington's role remains significant and crucial to Taiwan's next steps. Various reports have hinted that the US administration of President George W. Bush might talk Beijing into accepting Taipei's bid for observer status in the World Health Assembly. In that case, Taiwan should carefully consider whether to accept whatever Washington offers.
Washington's next step also must be to determine the "red lines" of the PRC authorities and define the "three conditions" under which Beijing would use "non-peaceful means" to try to take over Taiwan.
The next few months will be the real test for cross-strait relations. Taiwan's strategy of "self-restraint" changed its image and put the ball in China's court. Nevertheless, how Taiwan adjusts its cross-strait policy while making the best use of international leverage will determine the final victory in this tough battle.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS