So, Taiwan won the first round by successfully telling the world that democracy and peace should prevail over China's belligerent move to enact the "Anti-Secession Law." With a rational but steadfast demonstration of public will, the March 26 parade sent a clear message to the Beijing leadership that only the people of Taiwan can decide their own future.
After the parade, the month-long battle between Taiwan and China over Beijing's legislation has entered into the next stage -- an even more decisive struggle about how to forge an institutionalized and peace-oriented cross-strait interaction.
An authoritarian China might ignore international pressure -- including warnings from the US and Japan -- to take necessary steps to ease the tension created by its passage of the law. However, pressure would also be applied on Taiwan's government both domestically and externally.
After skillfully finding a balance between the necessity for the Taiwanese people to react strongly to Beijing's action and the need to show self-restraint in order to avoid making matters worse, the Chen Shui-bian (
What tops Chen's agenda next is how to bridge the diverse reactions to the government's cross-strait policy. The fundamentalists, led by former president Lee Teng-hui (
The opposition pan-blue camp, after boycotting the March 26 rally, started its own kowtow trip to China on Monday, led by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Chang Ping-kun (
The cross-strait stalemate will also bring new challenges to the recent attempts initiated by Chen to pursue reconciliation with People First Party Chairman James Soong (
On the international front, the short-term sympathy for Taiwan will not last long, and Taiwan should avoid complacency regarding its campaign against the Anti-Secession Law.
Chen must redouble his efforts to conduct intensive and frank communication with the US and other major countries to reiterate Taiwan's stance of "reconciliation without flinching, standing firm yet avoiding confrontation." Moreover, maintaining candid and frequent communication will help Taiwan's government learn what is on the minds of the leaders of the People's Republic of China (PRC).
Washington's role remains significant and crucial to Taiwan's next steps. Various reports have hinted that the US administration of President George W. Bush might talk Beijing into accepting Taipei's bid for observer status in the World Health Assembly. In that case, Taiwan should carefully consider whether to accept whatever Washington offers.
Washington's next step also must be to determine the "red lines" of the PRC authorities and define the "three conditions" under which Beijing would use "non-peaceful means" to try to take over Taiwan.
The next few months will be the real test for cross-strait relations. Taiwan's strategy of "self-restraint" changed its image and put the ball in China's court. Nevertheless, how Taiwan adjusts its cross-strait policy while making the best use of international leverage will determine the final victory in this tough battle.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS