While there is still no clear answer as to whether United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) was "assisting," conducting a transfer of technology to, or investing in He Jian Technology (Suzhou), a separate case of a large-scale investment project in China has been uncovered, this time by a state-run company.
On Feb. 26, Taiwan Fertilizer Company signed an agreement with Yangzhou Economic Development Zone, pledging an investment of US$180 million to establish a production and sales base. Taiwan Fertilizer has made it clear that the project is still in the planning stage, and that the signing of the agreement was simply to facilitate visits by Chinese personnel. The agreement states that the project will not be implemented until the authorities concerned approve the application.
Taiwan Fertilizer's investment proposal would not be barred under the government's list of industries banned from investing in China. The amount of the investment would not exceed 40 percent of Taiwan Fertilizer's corporate assets. Therefore, the Investment Commission has no legal basis for banning the project. But that doesn't mean the company should get a green light to move ahead with it. Regulations governing investment in China appear to be so lax that they failed to regulate such an investment. The project should be rejected by the government.
Given the relatively high unemployment rate in this country and concerns about the hollowing out of the industrial base, Taiwan Fertilizer should give priority to building the new compound fertilizer processing plant in Taiwan. How can it choose to set up a plant in China and create employment for the Chinese government?
There are several similarities between the this case and the UMC case. UMC has benefitted from the government's incentives to develop the high-tech industry. It enjoys preferential treatment financed by the Cabinet's Development Fund and capital for state-run businesses. As for Taiwan Fertilizer, more than half of its board of directors are government officials. The two companies rely to a large extent on the government, and this means they also have a social responsibility.
Regrettably, UMC's sneaking into China by "assisting" He Jian, and Taiwan Fertilizer's plan to invest NT$6 billion in China shows a serious lack of social responsibility and a neglect of national interests.
The dream of China as factory to the world, built on a formula that combines Taiwan's manufacturing power with cheap Chinese labor, land and preferential treatment has long attracted Taiwanese companies. Sustainable corporate management means moving on from contract manufacturing to concentrate on research and development, innovation and developing brand marketing. That is the only way for Taiwanese companies to compete in the world market. Investment in China runs counter to that goal, since it gives paramount importance to cheap labor and land while ignoring R&D, innovation and brand marketing. Relying only on price will lead to cut-throat competition and disappearing profits.
Taiwanese investment in China is a slow form of suicide for our industrial base and the economy as a whole. China's "Anti-Secession" Law is a visible threat, while investment in that country is a less tangible one. Unrestrained investment in China simply prepares us for the slaughter. Taiwan's current dependence on China in terms of investment and as an export market is seriously over the safety limit. Any change in the Chinese market will have a serious impact on this country.
If China decides to wage an economic war, we will be defenseless. UMC's and Taiwan Fertilizer's drive into China is bad for the nation. The government should use its authority and exercise the power of the law against these companies. Moreover, it should patch up the loopholes in laws related to investment in China. This is the only way to get to the root of the problem and save the nation's economy.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS