Since the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, its relations with Japan can be divided into two stages.
The first stage was from 1949 until 1971, before the two countries established diplomatic ties with each other. Since the Japanese authorities did not recognize the Chinese government, Beijing carried out unofficial diplomacy and had a good relationship with the Japanese private sector, while at the same time calling the Japanese government militaristic.
The second stage is the period from 1971 to the present. For China's part, accusations of Japanese militarism stopped after the establishment of diplomatic ties. But China's relationship with the Japanese private sector has gradually cooled down. Japan, meanwhile has consistently yielded to Beijing politically in order to develop economic relations. For example, Japan ignores China's crackdown on human rights and has even sacrificed its friendship with Taiwan. Japan is afraid of a rising China and is unwilling to irritate Beijing politically.
But after entering the new century, Sino-Japanese relations have changed. China is now the world's factory, and does not value Japanese capital and technology anymore. Japan also has a sense of crisis greater than any Western country and refuses to transfer technology to China. Not to mention that China has stirred up nationalism to consolidate itself. The growing political, economic and military pressure from China has triggered Japanese nationalism, especially in the younger generation. A series of incidents over the past few years have also changed their relations drastically. First, China's military development has forced Japan to review its policies. Chinese military expansion has gotten on Japan's nerves, so the latter has reduced its low interest rate loans to China. It has also amended its Constitution, which restrains its military power, while constantly adjusting its policy, and has sent troops to Iraq for peacekeeping purposes. These subtle adjustments have been made to prepare for drastic changes in the future.
China's anti-Japanese prejudice also worries the Japanese people. The aroused nationalism can hardly be eliminated. Crude messages left on Internet Web sites by angry Chinese youth also irritate Japan, which is under pressure from the Japanese people due to its concessions.
Recently, the tension between China and Japan has been shown in two respects. In addition to the sovereignty conflict over the Tiaoyutai (known in Japan as the Senkaku Islands), China's survey ships in the East China Sea have approached Japan's territory repeatedly, clearly showing that it wants to fight with Japan for access to the undersea oil fields in this area and to collect data on the sea environment for submarines. Also, take the recent Asian Cup soccer match in China for example. Chinese fans' anti-Japanese rhetoric and actions against Japan's soccer team were almost out of control. The Japanese government was unable to hide its irritation and was forced to take a harsh stance.
These cases may have the following impact: First, Japan will speed up its military reform, and promote military cooperation with Taiwan and the US. Second, Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs will face greater criticism for its pro-China policies, and is therefore likely to strengthen its relationship with Taiwan. Third, Japan's effort to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council will be blocked by China. Fourth, Chinese nationalism will make the world question China's ability to host the 2008 Olympic Games.
The decline of Sino-Japanese relations at present is related not only to the political situation across the Taiwan Strait, but also to the peace and stability in Asia.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS