The US-based Citibank's subsidiary, Sycamore Ventures, has entered a bid to buy shares of China Television Company (CTV), Broadcasting Corporation of China (BCC), Central Daily News and other media outlets from the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) Huahsia Investment Holding Company. The plan has caused a political struggle between the KMT and the Government Information Office (GIO). From a legal, political, and commercial standpoint, the KMT is like a trapped beast putting up a desperate fight.
Taiwan's terrestrial frequencies belong to the Taiwanese people, and television and radio stations only have the government's special permission to use them. The Broadcasting and Television Law (
The KMT finds itself at a legal, political and moral disadvantage. Its reliance on special privileges to monopolize the broadcast media was already a source of social discontent. The DPP government is well within its rights when it calls for reinstating order in the broadcasting industry.
Foreign investment in the KMT-run media may influence the media environment. This would be to the dismay of local media outlets, which already operate in an excessively competitive market. The DPP government gains further when it highlights the KMT's interest in foreign investment.
The timing of the bid may prove an even greater test for the KMT. The party is in urgent need of funds in order to pay for campaigning in the year-end legislative elections. The party may therefore not be able hold out until the end of next year, when the Broadcasting and Television Law (
The KMT believes that selling party assets to foreign firms is the best way of preventing them from becoming "green." This is ironic, considering that the Broadcasting and Television Law was enacted by a legislature controlled by the KMT. They have nobody to blame but themselves. Any inadequately prepared foreign investor who fails to realize that this is not a simple business acquisition, but an intimately connected struggle between media and political forces, will likely find itself in deep trouble.
The dissolution of the KMT's media empire is a necessary part of Taiwan's democratization, for the force represented by the KMT-owned media is not in accordance with fair play or justice. That this political force is now being applied to loosen the KMT's grip on broadcast frequencies obtained through political means is a step in the right direction. But regardless of whether the government obtains the wireless frequencies from BCC, or the television frequencies from CTV, the transition process must be in accordance with the public good.
If this is not the case, we will simply be breaking up one monolithic media group to replace it with another. For Taiwanese society, replacing a blue group with a green group does not rid the country of political involvement in the media.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS