Chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council Joseph Wu (吳釗燮), recently said that: "In order to promote cross-strait cultural and educational exchanges, the council will talk with the Ministry of Education (MOE) and related bodies about the idea of allowing Chinese students to study in Taiwan." The first step, he added, is to approve the enrollment of Chinese students in Taiwanese universities.
What kind of cultural and educational exchanges does Taiwan need to promote with China? Chinese history and literature make up a large proportion of our education system, starting from elementary schools and continue right up through to university.A plan to establish a graduate institute in Taiwanese history and a department of Taiwanese literature at National Cheng Kung and National Sun Yat-sen universities was rejected by pro-unification Mainlander professors on those campuses. In contrast, China understands Taiwan very well and the amount of Chinese publications in the history of Taiwanese literature surpasses our own at least five fold. Taiwan's university departments which carry Taiwanese literature even go so far as to use Chinese text books on the history of Taiwanese literature.
For the purpose of "understanding Taiwan," China's Xiamen University has expanded its Institute of Taiwan Studies (now called the College of Taiwan Studies) and is now subdivided into five institutes: Taiwanese politics, economics, history, literature, and cross-strait relations. Politicians here may not realize their political networks, interpersonal communications and social relationship are of interest to Chinese researchers. China even conducts "studies" into the daily travel habits of all Taiwan's military officers with the rank of colonel and above.
With this kind of interconnection of culture, and education, why bother with any further plan to "increase cross-strait cultural and educational exchanges?" In recent years, there has been a substantial migration of Taiwanese students to China, and many Taiwanese professors have also been eager to teach in China.
Thus, voices calling for the recognition of Chinese university diplomas are becoming louder, so the reason why the MOE has opened the doors to Chinese students is clear. With such a trend already occurring, why would Wu still want to pave the way for recognizing diplomas granted by Chinese universities?
When former president Lee Teng-hui (
After the Tiananmen Square Massacre, many Chinese officials believed that "safeguarding national integrity" would best be served by restoring military training courses in college, middle schools, and even elementary schools. While receiving this kind of training in the past, the young had to wear military uniforms, sing songs about the People's Liberation Army and adorn themselves with red scarves to signify fresh blood of China's revolutionary heros -- all to pay homage to the Chinese Communist Party.
The offspring of Taiwanese business people living in China would therefore be required to receive this kind of training. University undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral students in China are already required to study Marxism, the philosophy of Deng Xiaoping (
Many conservative university presidents here think there is no need for the MOE to insist on the principle of "bilateral equality and dignity." They also think it harmless to withdraw the word, "national," from a university's title in order to gain favor with Chinese universities. The notion that achieving a "consensus" on cross-strait exchange issues will eliminate the need for formal independence is taken for granted by Taiwanese university presidents.
Thus, Wu will be applauded by the Chinese government and Chinese living in Taiwan if he grants Chinese students permiss-ion to attend university here.
Slowly, and in small increments, government policy is taking us down a path headed to de facto unification. Because our economy is relatively small, it is necessary to boost our tourist industry by getting the Chinese to visit Taiwan. A low birth rate has resulted in an insufficient enrollment rate in the nation's 60 universities and many think we need to start attracting some of the 8 million Chinese students here to fill the gap. All of these steps will put us on a slippery slope that will lead to reunification.
The Southern Taiwan Society is an organization that promotes formal sovereignty for Taiwan. The Union of Taiwanese Teachers is a group which seeks to foster independent thinking and judgement.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS