Let's face it. For the past four years, Taiwan's politics have been driven by domestic considerations. The direct result has been a difficult diplomatic environment for the nation that stems largely from China's rise. China is growing both economically and militarily. But more importantly, in recent years China has reached out to the world and exerted increasing influence in global affairs. Under the doctrine of "great power diplomacy," Beijing has launched a series of diplomatic initiatives to improve its international status.
That explains why President Chen Shui-bian (
To what extent has the nation dealt with the rise of China's global influence? Premiere Yu Shyi-kun and Chen are scheduled to visit Taiwan's diplomatic allies in Central America this month. And while most domestic attention has focused on post-election political wrestling between the pan-green and pan-blue camps, the Chen administration did score some political points through low-key diplomatic maneuverings.
Presidential Office Secretary-General Su Jen-chang (蘇貞昌) visited the Philippines in early June and allegedly met with high-ranking government officials. Around the same time, Singaporean Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) made his first trip to Taiwan since 1992 and exchanged information with political and economic heavyweights in Taipei.
Those diplomatic interactions illustrate a structural transformation of the country's foreign policy orientation. Only by redefining a grand strategy and reallocating limited resources can the nation earn more international recognition. During his first term, Chen unveiled his diplomatic philosophy of advancing a new image for Taiwan as a responsible member of the international order. However, no major progress has been made, except for increased support from the US and Japan on Taiwan's bid for observer status in the World Health Organization.
After successfully winning reelection, Chen initiated steps to broaden Taiwan's ties with its neighbors. Su and Lee's visits serve as good examples of the administration's relocating its "Go South" policy to southeast Asia. The renewal of the "Go South" policy will diversify Taiwan's economy away from overdependence on China. Consolidating Taiwan's current diplomatic support is crucial, given China's attempt to buy off countries and peel them away from Taiwan. This consolidation is not only strategically necessary but also politically urgent.
Finally, for Taiwan's leaders to break through Chinese obstructions and visit countries without diplomatic ties to Taiwan is not sufficient -- although such visits are not without significance. The idea of Taiwan "walking out into the world" is to move beyond the narrow focus on political interests to a focus on creating long-term, stable relationships.
In this regard, Taiwan should utilize its economic power and democratic performance to foster international cooperation. Democracy is what separates Taiwan from China. The peaceful transition of power in 2000 was a milestone for this robust democracy. Chen's successful reelection demonstrated the deepening of democracy. Therefore, the government should play the "democracy card" to distinguish itself from Beijing's authoritarian rule and win worldwide endorsement.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS