After the March 20 presidential election, many of the nation's political commentators suddenly discovered that growing "Taiwan consciousness" -- first promoted by former president Lee Teng-hui (
After nearly 50 years of autocratic rule by the KMT government, the Taiwanese people certainly hoped that the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) government would correct many wrongs when it assumed power in 2000. The public is particularly concerned about the existence or abolition of the Constitution of the Republic of China (ROC).
In light of the current development of the nation's constitutional democracy, it's time to significantly amend the "ROC" Constitution, which was completely unrelated to Taiwan during the process of its establishment. After the regime of the late president Chiang Kai-shek (
But as every Taiwanese knows, the Constitution divides the state into five separate powers. In addition to the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Yuan, it allows the Examination and Control Yuans to waste public funds, since their functions are very limited. If, therefore, Taiwan wants to emulate advanced democratic countries and set up a state with three separate powers, the Constitution must be amended or a new constitution written.
In addition, the Constitution does not clearly define the scope of the nation's territory. Some people therefore believe it to be enormous, encompassing the People's Republic of China and Mongolia, while others claim that it only includes Taiwan island, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. There are numerous preposterous interpretations of what constitutes the country's territory. Lawmakers with different political outlooks often quarrel in the legislature -- and sometimes even come to blows. This behavior has gained international notoriety and seriously hampers legislative efficiency.
There is also the question of whether the number of legislative seats should be halved and electoral districts redrawn. Unless authorities such as the National Unification Council (國統會), the Taiwan Provincial Government and the Fukien Provincial Government are quickly abolished, the nation will not be doing right by taxpayers and their hard-earned money.
We have pointed out these examples to show that in this country the public will is paramount, and that any party wishing to rule cannot turn their back on the people's "Taiwan consciousness." The arguments presented about these issues by Lien and Soong have been insubstantial and weak. They seem more concerned with Beijing's attitude than with the sentiments of the people. It is this attitude that planted the seeds of their electoral defeat.
Now, PFP Vice Chairman Chang Chao-hsiung (張昭雄) has led his party's caucus in opposing discussion of a constitutional amendment bill. In doing this, he has gone back on the consensus established by all parties last month, and shown the PFP to be yet again obstructing the progress of democracy. They will pay a heavy price for flying in the face of mainstream public opinion. Have they learned nothing from their defeat in the Kaohsiung by-elections last month? Will the PFP follow the path of the New Party into political oblivion?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS