Within a few years, tourists across much of Asia will be able to change money at a Singapore-owned bank and hop a budget airline to the city-state to gamble and drink the night away.
Singapore is not about to emulate Hong Kong, another small, rich former British colony, and deliberately run down the industrial base on which it built its prosperity, analysts say.
But facing inroads from cheap manufacturers such as China and India as well as growing competition from its Southeast Asian neighbors for tourist dollars, Singapore's planners are doing what economists have long advocated by placing more emphasis on higher-end services.
Hedge funds are springing up like mushrooms in the city, while on Tuesday filmmaker George Lucas said he had chosen Singapore as his creative empire's first overseas outpost.
"There's a general sense that you have to maintain Singapore's viability and attractiveness as a regional center, which thrives on having a critical mass of activities and people of diverse backgrounds, jobs and so on congregating in one place," said Manu Bhaskaran, head of economic research in Singapore for Washington-based consultants Centennial Group.
Preserving that critical mass entails tough decisions.
Asia's first terminal dedicated to budget airlines, due to open in 2006, could take business away from flag carrier Singapore Airlines. Plans for a casino are going ahead over the initial opposition of Singapore's founding father, Lee Kuan Yew (
Regional Competition
In the social sphere, Singapore has eased bans on chewing gum and bar-top dancing, extended pub hours and begun to show more tolerance of gays. Significantly for investors, this gradual remodelling partly reflects a growing vibrancy in the 10-member ASEAN.
Adam Le Mesurier of Goldman Sachs said Singapore's port and airport restructuring, as well as its "remarkable U-turn" on allowing a casino, reflected the fact that its government-linked companies for the first time are facing external competition in areas like tourism and transport from Malaysia and Thailand.
"It is early days still, but this theme of greater intra-ASEAN competition in the services sector is starting to become an important new productivity driver in the region," Le Mesurier said in a note to clients.
Under new Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi, Malaysia's sometimes prickly relations with Singapore are warming, and Le Mesurier said this could usher in a wave of Singaporean investment that would boost Malaysian competitiveness.
The two countries' stock exchanges are discussing a tie-up, while Singapore state-owned investment agency Temasek Holdings has already been allowed to buy a 5 percent stake in government-owned Telekom Malaysia.
Temasek is also buying a 15 percent stake of Malaysia's Alliance Bank, adding to a portfolio of minority bank stakes it has built up in India, Indonesia and South Korea.
Hong Kong
Bhaskaran agreed it made sense for Singapore to outsource more low-end services to Malaysia, but he said the city-state would not turn its back on industry in the way Hong Kong has.
In 1983, manufacturing accounted for 23 percent of GDP in both port cities. Today it accounts for more than 24 percent in Singapore and less than 5 percent in Hong Kong, which has moved most of its factories to China.
"We will not go down the path that Hong Kong took. We don't have to, and we will not," Bhaskaran said. "We are very competitive in high-value items where infrastructure, policy support and availability of talent are critical, be it pharmaceuticals, high-end electronics or whatever."
More's the pity, according to Jim Walker of brokers CLSA, who argues that Singapore's leaders indulge their "production mentality" by giving generous investment subsidies in industries they pick as winners, a practice that may yet come back to haunt taxpayers.
"The preferences of politicians, not the market, are reflected in the Singapore industrial structure. Not so Hong Kong," he wrote.
Walker, who works in Hong Kong, predicts a boom for the territory from providing financial and other services for China and catering to mainland tourists freed to travel.
Some firms will choose to list in Singapore over Hong Kong, but he says the Southeast Asian country's location precludes it from becoming a serious competitor for China's riches.
"Singapore is not part of China. It cannot rival Hong Kong for the freedom of access that individual traveller rights have bestowed," he said.
Daniel Lian of Morgan Stanley in Singapore see things differently. He agrees that Singapore will find it hard to extract value from technology manufacturing and top-end services because of its high cost base and stiffening competition.
But Lian sees trouble for Hong Kong, too, if China's leaders decide to marginalize the city for political or other reasons.
"If policy makers want Hong Kong to be a second-tier Chinese city, it will happen," he said in a report.
Lian leaves property-mad Hong Kong residents with a chilling thought: within two decades, he says, prime residential areas in Hong Kong will be much cheaper than in top-tier Chinese cities.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS