You would have thought that rising levels of sexually transmitted infections would convince us of the need for good sex advice -- from someone who can help us negotiate and enjoy safer sex, cope with relationships, and debunk the many myths about sex. Sex education shouldn't begin and end at school, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are not just for teenagers.
Qualified sex advisers do exist, but as an adult you are much more likely to hear from the less-qualified "sexpert" -- a media creation usually presented as a schoolmistress, seductress, pseudo-scientist, or combination of all three. Of course, there's nothing wrong with any of the above -- you can be sexy and give good advice -- but many of the nation's sex advisers just aren't up to the job.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
British Men's magazine Zoo recently launched a sex supplement with glamour model "Dr" Jodie Marsh at the helm. "No seven years at medical college for our resident sexpert," read the introduction.
"Jodie got her expertise burning the midnight oil at the University of Dirty Sex."
Jodie concurred: "I haven't exactly got a degree in psychology, but I just love sex, don't I?"
To me, this is like someone announcing, "I'm a lawyer! I don't have any legal qualifications, but I never miss an episode of Judge John Deed!"
I'm a psychologist specializing in sex research. I have a doctorate in pornography (yes, a real degree), in which I evaluated sex studies on explicit materials. Over the past 13 years I've carried out research on sexual functioning, and on street prostitution. I train health professionals, and provide sex information through two advice columns and a radio phone-in. But I avoid using the title "sexpert": it lumps me in with everyone else, qualified or not, and I want people to trust me. Nor can we dismiss Marsh's column as a predictable lad's-mag stunt; women's magazines and self-help publishing are just as rife with underqualified sexperts.
Right now, we desperately need access to good advice about sex and sexual health. Apart from the increase in STIs and teenage pregnancy in the UK, we are facing a global HIV/Aids pandemic. Levels of sexual dissatisfaction are high, expectations are unrealistic and pharmaceutical companies are exploiting our anxieties about sexual functioning. Too often, sex advisers or columnists will assume that people over 25 aren't at risk from STIs (they are) and are in monogamous relationships; condoms and safer sex just don't come up.
What do come up, again and again, are the same tired myths about sex and sexuality (see side panel). They get repeated because they sound credible (though they aren't), and because many consumer magazines cannibalize features from one another. There comes a point at which the ideas are repeated so often they start to sound true, which is probably why a senior magazine executive recently told me, "There's nothing new in sex."
Women tend to contact me with questions about body image and self-confidence; they worry about getting or keeping a partner; they worry that if they're not "good in bed" they will be rejected. Guys are concerned about penis size, shape, length, ejaculation, and how long they ought to last. Both genders, gay or straight, worry about having arguments, and what to do if you go off sex, particularly in a long-term relationship.
A good sex expert can answer these questions, and hopefully make people feel more sexually confident. But a lot of sexperts don't.
Instead, they reinforce the idea that women should use sex to keep a partner interested, or that sex for women is more about pleasing someone else than pleasing themselves. The emotional and communicative aspects are sidelined. Men come under pressure to last for as long as humanly possible -- which actually increases their chance of having sexual problems.
There are countless examples of the wrong advice being given. Women go off sex because they're tired, because they have relationship problems, a new baby or because they have never learned what works for them. But instead of being given advice which might help solve these issues, they get referred to a testosterone patch they won't need and which hasn't yet been invented.
There is no recognized qualification in the field, which means anyone can set themselves up as an expert. There are many highly qualified people based within academia or health care, but they tend not to appear on television or to write bestsellers, and so don't have quite the same profile. The reason? Their work is evaluated on grants obtained to fund research, and through publishing papers in journals based on that research; writing a popular sex book is seen as a distraction and is discouraged.
But even if they were tempted, they often feel there's little point in talking to journalists. Why bother when someone with no training gets the same billing?
Sexperts are, for the most part, fairly conventional. On the occasions when I have tried to provide alternative information that breaks this mold, it has caused problems. One journalist asked me if the hardest thing about marriage was accepting that you would be having sex with one person for the rest of your life. I suggested that people who were genuinely worried about this had choices, such as sharing fantasies, looking at erotica, watching other couples have sex, even having sex with other couples.
"Eeeew, that's disgusting!" she said. "I'm talking about normal relationships."
Another example: many men find it difficult to keep an erection with a condom on and so go without, putting their partners at risk from disease. But when I suggested to a men's magazine editor that one solution was to masturbate with a condom on, he nearly fell out of his chair and told me this was "far too rude."
What can we expect from an expert in sex? Pretty much what we'd demand from anyone claiming expertise in any other area of health.
They should have professional or extensive personal experience in the world of sex, a link to a professional body, and they should network with colleagues. They should be aware of developments in sex, have supervision where appropriate, and continually seek professional development.
They also need to tailor their advice to suit different ages, sexualities, ethnic or religious groups, as well as people with different sexual, physical or mental-health needs. They don't need to be academics, but they do need to know their limits. We don't call someone who claims to know something about the heart a "cardiologist" -- so why accept second best from sex?
Petra Boynton is a lecturer in international health services research at University College, London. She is not a sexpert.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
RSS