Roads threaten ecosystems
While it is true that repairing the mountain road in Hoping township, between Taichung and Lushan, may be beneficial to the farmers of the area ("Locals divided over fate of Cross-Island Highway," Aug. 1, page 1), I agree with environmentalists like Chang Feng-nian (張豐年), because roads everywhere, and especially in mountain regions, destroy fragile ecosystems.
That is not even touching on the fact that driving in mountain areas is dangerous at best, even in broad daylight in good weather. Then there is the horrible death toll and social cost to the public due to the general increase of cars and trucks on highways.
But the powers that be will bat the issue back and forth, or more correctly, continue to lobby for contracts to build roads while ignoring more sensible solutions, because, unless legislation is passed to prevent it, there will always be big money at stake in converting cheap gravel and cement into lucrative highway contracts.
I was horrified last month to read of the ongoing reports of Tropical Storm Mindulle's devastation along with the news that the authorities plan to go ahead with building the new highway between Suau and Hualien.
Actually, it isn't surprising when you consider typhoons as a bonanza to road builders, who go back to repair the very same roads they had built, not forgetting to bill the taxpayers for repairs far exceeding the costs of the original construction. Continuous repair is the one big perk to road building.
I seriously doubt the excuse that the farmers in Lushan, who have pretty much denuded the entire area of vegetation to make way for their peach trees, need the highway to "get their goods to market," as much as they would love to have a wide highway to drive their blue trucks on.
Nor do I buy into Taichung County Commissioner Huang Chung Sheng's (黃仲生) excuse that commuting from the mountains to the plains is a "tremendous inconvenience" to Aborigines, hence the "urgent need" to rebuild the road segment. Has anyone ever considered a train line between Kukuan and Techi? If transporting goods, or Aborigine salarymen, to Taichung were really the crucial issue, I'd suggest building a train line from Lushan to Taichung.
Narrower cuts through that mountainous area would have a far smaller impact on the ecosystem, as well as ensuring better drainage.
A train could transport farm produce and commuters much more easily to the big cities, as well as ferry tourists to Lushan and Hehuan Shan. It would surely provide a safer and much more unforgettable alternative to driving.
Whenever those with vested interests try to sell us more cars, or promote road-building as "progress," they fail to mention that for every new vehicle on the road, society must also make room for a parking space.
These "visionaries" seem to be at odds with reality, much the same as the notorious "pro-lifers" who want every unborn child to live, yet hardly consider any educational or social levies to provide for the additional mouths to feed.
Most of the vacant land in inner cities that could be used for green areas, urban gardens or parks for our children have to take second priority to the added pressures of parking.
The summer temperatures in cities like Taipei or Kaohsiung are becoming more and more intolerable, yet the heat from the extra paved-over spaces, as well as more and more cars on the streets spewing out emissions and adding to traffic congestion, are hardly considered the culprit. All I ever read in the newspapers is that we need more highways, more roads, more cars.
A few months ago, I witnessed someone in my neighborhood cementing around an old coconut tree to provide for another parking space.
Although the tree had most certainly withstood countless typhoons, having cement around it proved too much, as it gave the surrounding soil less water (and less flexibility in a typhoon). That tree's trunk snapped right in half during Mindulle.
Though many people outside Taichung can say they were unaffected by Mindulle, I'd say that I was poignantly affected. One tree may seem trivial, but it is just another link in the chain that holds our entire existence together, and it is exactly what I think about when I hear developers or sold-out politicians talking about more roads and cars.
John Schneidhorst
Kaohsiung
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS