From a number of recent polls it would appear that support for the pan-blue camp is lower than ever before, and the individual popularity of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) has fallen to shockingly low levels as well. Political commentators, both pro-green and pro-blue, are increasingly concluding that the pan-blue camp will not be able to retain its legislative majority in the year-end elections.
What should they do? Soong's political contortions have never really gotten away from the tired old ploy of forming a "pan-blue alliance" as a way to save the situation. He even wants to incorporate the Taiwan Democracy School (TDS) to build up the number of seats the blues might be able to win. We don't know if Lien approved it or not, but the chairman of the new group, Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良), snubbed Soong's offer. Anyway, the real question is with the pan-blue camp now in total disarray, how can the TDS, which regards itself as pan-blue, manage to save it?
Even if Lien wanted to go along with Soong, he no longer has the authority to bend the party to his will, and virtually no one in the KMT supports Soong. Even members of the PFP such as Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) and Hsu Yuan-kuo (許淵國) don't seem to believe that Soong's "alliance" plan can save the PFP. They have pointed out that the PFP has reached its present situation because it is out of touch with the people, and re-establishing that connection should be the party's first priority.
Looked at in this way, the "alliance" is doomed, with "no help from above or support from below." It is worth observing that in the PFP, which has been called a "one-man party," the chairman has already lost his authority and looks like he will follow the same road as Lien, so that they will truly be "brothers in distress."
With Soong's "alliance" clearly dead at birth, Lien has sought to persuade Soong to focus on legislative reform and constitutional amendment, and it is said that Soong gladly agreed. When Lien ordered party staff to give priority to this issue, his most significant statement was that "this is even more important than the March 19 investigation commission." This clearly indicates that Lien has accepted Wang Jin-pyng's (王金平) election strategy, attacking the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on the issue of constitutional amendment and focusing the party's energy on President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) proposal that a new constitution should be completed by 2006.
Two points emerge from this: first, that Lien has abandoned hope in the investigation commission into the election-eve attack on the president. His solemn oath of "no truth, no president" was clearly insincere, for otherwise, why would he abandon it as soon as it no longer seems useful? Clearly this slogan was simply a result of his unwillingness to concede defeat.
Second, not only are PFP legislators protesting, but even KMT legislators do not much fancy their prospects. PFP chief whip Liu Wen-hsiung (劉文雄) said that flood relief in the wake of Tropical Storm Mindulle will at least be popular with the public, while a constitutional amendment will simply be setting the stage for the DPP. KMT Legislator Apollo Chen (
Lien and Soong are clearly a spent force. Not only are they unable to bring their parties together, they seem incapable of leading their own party members. The very fact that Lien and Soong are still able to remain at the head of their parties reveals the unique character of a country in which party and nation are still regarded as one.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS