From a number of recent polls it would appear that support for the pan-blue camp is lower than ever before, and the individual popularity of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) has fallen to shockingly low levels as well. Political commentators, both pro-green and pro-blue, are increasingly concluding that the pan-blue camp will not be able to retain its legislative majority in the year-end elections.
What should they do? Soong's political contortions have never really gotten away from the tired old ploy of forming a "pan-blue alliance" as a way to save the situation. He even wants to incorporate the Taiwan Democracy School (TDS) to build up the number of seats the blues might be able to win. We don't know if Lien approved it or not, but the chairman of the new group, Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良), snubbed Soong's offer. Anyway, the real question is with the pan-blue camp now in total disarray, how can the TDS, which regards itself as pan-blue, manage to save it?
Even if Lien wanted to go along with Soong, he no longer has the authority to bend the party to his will, and virtually no one in the KMT supports Soong. Even members of the PFP such as Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) and Hsu Yuan-kuo (許淵國) don't seem to believe that Soong's "alliance" plan can save the PFP. They have pointed out that the PFP has reached its present situation because it is out of touch with the people, and re-establishing that connection should be the party's first priority.
Looked at in this way, the "alliance" is doomed, with "no help from above or support from below." It is worth observing that in the PFP, which has been called a "one-man party," the chairman has already lost his authority and looks like he will follow the same road as Lien, so that they will truly be "brothers in distress."
With Soong's "alliance" clearly dead at birth, Lien has sought to persuade Soong to focus on legislative reform and constitutional amendment, and it is said that Soong gladly agreed. When Lien ordered party staff to give priority to this issue, his most significant statement was that "this is even more important than the March 19 investigation commission." This clearly indicates that Lien has accepted Wang Jin-pyng's (王金平) election strategy, attacking the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on the issue of constitutional amendment and focusing the party's energy on President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) proposal that a new constitution should be completed by 2006.
Two points emerge from this: first, that Lien has abandoned hope in the investigation commission into the election-eve attack on the president. His solemn oath of "no truth, no president" was clearly insincere, for otherwise, why would he abandon it as soon as it no longer seems useful? Clearly this slogan was simply a result of his unwillingness to concede defeat.
Second, not only are PFP legislators protesting, but even KMT legislators do not much fancy their prospects. PFP chief whip Liu Wen-hsiung (劉文雄) said that flood relief in the wake of Tropical Storm Mindulle will at least be popular with the public, while a constitutional amendment will simply be setting the stage for the DPP. KMT Legislator Apollo Chen (
Lien and Soong are clearly a spent force. Not only are they unable to bring their parties together, they seem incapable of leading their own party members. The very fact that Lien and Soong are still able to remain at the head of their parties reveals the unique character of a country in which party and nation are still regarded as one.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS